Answer:
40
Step-by-step explanation:
The number of gift baskets Nikki can make varies directly with the amount of time she spends making the baskets .
Let n be the number of baskets and let t be the mount of time it takes to make the basket. This means that:
n α t
=> n = kt
where k = constant of proportionality
She can make 4 baskets in every 1/2 hour.
This means that:
4 = k * 1/2
=> k = 4 * 2 = 8 baskets per hour
The time is now 5 hours (t = 5). Therefore:
n = 8 * 5 = 40 baskets
She can make 40 baskets in 5 hours.
Answer:
A = 3 ft, B = 7 ft, C = 4 ft, D = 5 ft, Surface Area = 96 ft^2
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step 1: Determine the sides</u>
A → 3 ft
B → 7 ft
C → 4 ft
D → 5 ft
<u>Step 2: Determine the surface area</u>
Area of the sides
Area of the top and bottom triangles
Total Area
Answer: A = 3 ft, B = 7 ft, C = 4 ft, D = 5 ft, Surface Area = 96 ft^2
Answer: The difference is as follows:
Step-by-step explanation:
- Deductive Arguments: A deductive argument is an argument wherein it is felt that the premises give an assurance of reality of the end. In a deductive arguments, the premises are planned to offer help for the conclusion that is so strong to an extent that, if the premises are valid, it would be impossible for the conclusion to be false.
- Inductive Arguments: An inductive arguments is an arguments where it is believed that the premises provide reasons supporting the likely truth of the conclusion. In an inductive arguments, the premises are proposed distinctly to be strong to an extent that, on the off chance that they are valid, at that point it is impossible that the conclusion is false.
The contrast between the two originates from the kind of connection the author or explainer of the argument takes there to be between the premises and the conclusion. In the event that the author of the argument accepts that reality of the premises certainly sets up reality of the conclusion because of definition, l<igical entailment or scientific need, at that point the argument is deductive. In the event that the author of the argument does not feel that reality of the premises certainly sets up reality of the conclusion, however in any case accepts that their fact gives valid justification to accept the conclusion genuine, at that point the argument is inductive.
Answer:
-x
Step-by-step explanation:
