Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
When I looked more into it, information on certain sites stated that it depended on the minor crime, the most I could find was someone saying 2000. One can only assume the closest number though.
Keep in mind that I'm no expert and just looked it up ;-; I tried to help though
Resilience. A good correctional officer should learn from their mistakes and use those lessons to get better at what they do. ...
Communication skills. ...
Open-mindedness. ...
Stress management skills. ...
Self-discipline. ...
Analytical skills. ...
Teamwork. ...
Problem-solving skills.
