1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexgriva [62]
3 years ago
9

A homeless man in Panama City was arrested and charged with theft. He could not afford an attorney and had to go to trial withou

t one. Which right of the man's was violated?
Law
1 answer:
MakcuM [25]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

His 6th amendment right was violated. The 6th amendment states that you are guaranteed a speedy public trial, an impartial jury, and that the accused can confront witnesses against them, and that the accused must be allowed to have a lawyer, regardless of cost or social status.

You might be interested in
Will give Brainliest. How could the Women's Health Protection Act of 2021 affect other levels of government?
mina [271]
It will prohibit laws against woman and create a more even playing field for woman
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What fraction of both houses must vote to override a veto?
barxatty [35]

Answer:

Two thirds of both houses must vote to override a veto.

Explanation:

The word veto comes from Latin and literally means 'forbid'. It is used to denote that a certain party has the right to unilaterally stop a certain piece of legislation. A veto, therefore, provides unlimited power to stop changes, but not to adopt them.

In the United States, the president has the ability to veto legislation that has passed through Congress, but this right is not absolute. A qualified majority of 2/3 of both houses can pass a law, even against a presidential veto; However, if the proposed law has only a simple majority, the president's veto is decisive.

3 0
2 years ago
Discuss two merits and domerits of representative government​
Taya2010 [7]
Hi I just need pints jeje
4 0
3 years ago
What have some departments done to eliminate unethical conduct by it's officers
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

In 2005, police misconduct in New Orleans had reached an all-time high. In the weeks before and after Hurricane Katrina, several high-profile beatings and unjustified shootings by police led to intense federal scrutiny of the New Orleans Police Department (NOPD), including a 2010 U.S. Department of Justice investigation and a 2013 federal consent decree to overhaul policies and promote greater transparency and more civilian oversight of the police force.

In 2017, the NOPD aspires to serve as a model for how to reduce police misconduct. Rather than standing silently by—or joining in on a fellow officer's brutality—New Orleans

6 0
2 years ago
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the Most Important function of government?
    15·2 answers
  • This article of the constitution deals with the executive branch
    10·1 answer
  • Oscar owns a bulldog. Another dog owner filed a lawsuit against Oscar alleging that his bulldog injured her pet poodle in a dog
    14·1 answer
  • What type of employee is most likely to steal from their employer
    11·2 answers
  • According to a constitutional court, what is the source of African values?<br><br><br><br><br>​
    5·2 answers
  • What make an action become terroristic?
    8·1 answer
  • How are taking photographs and making casts similar? How are they different?
    10·1 answer
  • When a group is experiencing a lot of upheaval or social change for some reason,
    13·2 answers
  • Are federal agencies required to have rcr policies
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following people is the best-known example of a policy entrepreneur?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!