Southern land owners replaced it with sharecropping.
Answer:
The government (Legislature)
Explanation:
The citizens have the fundamental right to decide who is going to lead them and basic freedom, in a Democratic system of government, but the legislative arm decides on how the freedom would be used.
In a kinship system with matrilineal descent, a man inherit his rights to land and clan wealth from mother's brother.
What is Kinship system?
The pattern of culturally accepted interactions amongst family members is referred to as the "kinship system." In certain cultures, matrilineal descent uses the maternal line of relationships between mothers and their offspring to identify membership in the kinship group. One of the basic organizing tenets of human civilization is this. Based on kinship through marriage, adoption, or bloodlines. Kinship refers to the relationship that exists between two people based on a marriage or blood relationship. The use of kinship sets rules for interactions between members of certain social groups. It outlines suitable and appropriate role relationships. As a result, it controls social life.
To know more about kinship refer:
brainly.com/question/28139104
#SPJ4
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.
Declare war and make treaties
