All categories

3 years ago

Hello! I’m really struggling with this, any help is appreciated (:

Mathematics

1 answer:

iragen [17]3 years ago

5 0

Hi, It's the 3rd option

Thanks, It was little hard to find the answer. I am not totally sure about it but as far as I understand this question. the third option is correct.

You might be interested in

Each batch of cookies requires

Snezhnost [94]

Answer:

5 cups of sugar

Step-by-step explanation:

4/5 times 5 equals a whole number

4 0

2 years ago

35% of the students on a field trip love the zoo. If there are students on the field trip, how many love the zoo?

kenny6666 [7]

Your question is missing an important value. That is the number of people on this trip. So we assume that 250 people are on this trip.

Answer:

88 persons

Step-by-step explanation:

Be cause your question does not have the total number of people on this trip, I assumed that the number of people should be 250.

Now we are to find 35% of 250.

This would give the total number of people they enjoyed the trip

0.35 x 250

= 87.5

approximately 88 persons

So we say that 88 persons loved the zoo.

To trick is to find 35% of whatever number of people are on this field trip.

8 0

3 years ago

a set v is given, together with definitions of addition and scalar multiplication. determine which properties of a vector space

agasfer [191]

The properties of a vector space are satisfied Properties 1,2, 5(a) and 5(c) are satisfied, the relaxation of the homes aren't legitimate are if $v = x ^ 2 1× v=1^ ×x ^ 2 = 1 #V$

Property three does now no longer follow: Suppose that Property three is legitimate, shall we name $v = a * x ^ 2 +bx +c$ the neuter of V. Since v is the neuter, then O have to be constant with the aid of using the neuted, consequently $0 = O + v = (O x ^ 2 + Ox + O) + (a × x ^ 2 + bx + c) = c × x ^ 2 + b ^ 2 + a$

= 0 If O is the neuter, then it ought to restore x², but $0+ x² = (0x²+0x+zero) + (x²+0x+zero) = 1.$ This is a contradiction due to the fact x² isn't 1. We finish that V doesnt have a neuter vector. This additionally method that belongings four would not observe either. A set with out 0 cant

have additive inverse

$Let r= v ×2x ^ 2 + v × 1x +v0 , w= w ×2x ^ 2 + w × 1x +w0 . We have that\\v+w= (vO + wO) ^ x^ 2 +(vl^ × wl)^ x+ ( v 2^ × w2)• w+v= (wO + vO) ^x^ 2 +(wl^ × vl)x+ ( w 2^ ×v2)$

Since the sum of actual numbers is commutative, we finish that v + w = w + v Therefore, belongings 5(a) is valid.

Property 5(b) isn't valid: we are able to introduce

a counter example. we could use z = 1 then $v = x ^ 2 w = x ^ 2 + 1\\(v + w) + z = (x ^ 2 + 2) + 1 = 3x ^ 2 + 1$

v + (w + z) = x ^ 2 + (2x ^ 2 + 1) = x ^ 2 + 3

Since 3x ^ 2 +1 ne x^ 2 +3. then the associativity rule doesnt hold.

$(1+2)^ * (x^ 2 +x)=3^ * (x ^ 2 + x) = 3x + 3\\1^ × (x^ 2 +x)+2^ × (x ^ 2 + x) = (x + 1) + (2x + 2) = 3x ^ 2 + x ( ne 3x + 3 )\\(1^ ×2)^ ×(x^ 2 +x)=2^ × (x ^ 2 + x) = 2x + 2\\1^ × (2^ × (x ^ 2 + x) )=1^ × (2x+2)=2x^ 2 +2x( ne2x+2)$

Property f doesnt observe because of the switch of variables. for instance, if v = x ^ 2 1 × v=1^ × x ^ 2 = 1 #V

Properties 1,2, 5(a) and 5(c) are satisfied, the relaxation of the homes arent legitimate.

Step-with the aid of using-step explanation:

Note that each sum and scalar multiplication entails in replacing the order from that most important coefficient with the impartial time period earlier than doing the same old sum/scalar multiplication.

Property three does now no longer follow: Suppose that Property three is legitimate, shall we name v = a × x ^ 2 +bx +c the neuter of V. Since v is the neuter, then O have to be constant with the aid of using the neuted, consequently $0 = O + v = (O × x ^ 2 + Ox + O) + (a × x ^ 2 + bx + c) = c × x ^ 2 + b ^ 2 + a$

= zero If O is the neuter, then it ought to restore x², but zero $+ x² = (0x²+0x+zero) + (x²+0x+zero) = 1.$ This is a contradiction due to the fact x² isn't 1. We finish that V doesnt have a neuter vector. This additionally method that belongings four would not observe either. A set with out 0 cant have additive inverse

Let $r= v × 2x ^ 2 + v × 1x +v0 , w= w2x ^ 2 + w × 1x +w0 . \\We have thatv+w= (vO + wO) ^ x^ 2 +(vl^ wl)^x+ ( v 2^ w2)w+v= (wO + vO) ^ x^ 2 +(wl^ vl)x+ ( w 2^v2)$

Since the sum of actual numbers is commutative, we finish that v + w = w + v Therefore, belongings 5(a) is valid.

Property 5(b) isn't valid: we are able to introduce

a counter example. we could use $z = 1 then v = x ^ 2 w = x ^ 2 + 1(v + w) + z = (x ^ 2 + 2) + 1 = 3x ^ 2 + 1v + (w + z) = x ^ 2 + (2x ^ 2 + 1) = x ^ 2 + 3\\Since 3x ^ 2 +1 ne x^ 2 +3.$ then the associativity rule doesnt hold.

Note that each expressions are same because of the distributive rule of actual numbers. Also, you could be aware that his assets holds due to the fact in each instances we 'switch variables twice.

$· (1+2)^ * (x^ 2 +x)=3^ * (x ^ 2 + x) = 3x + 31^ * (x^ 2 +x)+2^ * (x ^ 2 + x) = (x + 1) + (2x + 2) = 3x ^ 2 + x ( ne 3x + 3 )(1^ * 2)^ * (x^ 2 +x)=2^ * (x ^ 2 + x) = 2x + 21^ * (2^ * (x ^ 2 + x) )=1^ ×* (2x+2)=2x^ 2 +2x( ne2x+2)$