Answer:
(B) $5,000 favorable.
Explanation:
Variable cost flexible budget variance:
budget for 6,000 units total variable cost: $180,000
We divide the total cost by the activity in that budget:
$180,000/ 6,000 = 30
Now we multiply by the actual volume:
5,000 x 30 = 150,000
Now we do flexible budget - actual cost = variance
150,000 - 145,000 = 5,000 favorable
It is favorable, as the cost where less than expected.
Based on the research studies and situation described, according to Levinson, Jensen is in the <u>Novice</u> phase of adult development.
Daniel Levinson was a famous researcher whose interest centered on different stages of life from childhood to old age.
Daniel Levinson concluded that early adulthood lies between the ages of 17 to 45.
This early adulthood is then categorized into two, the <u>novice</u> phase between 17 to 33 and the culminating phase, which is between 33 to 45.
Thus, given that Jensen is 25, it is concluded that according to Levinson, Jensen is in the <u>Novice</u> phase of adult development.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>Novice</u>."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/1578703
Answer:
g = 0.05229 or 5.229% rounded off to 5.23%
Explanation:
Using the constant growth model of dividend discount model, we can calculate the price of the stock today. The DDM values a stock based on the present value of the expected future dividends from the stock. The formula for price today under this model is,
P0 = D1 / (r - g)
Where,
- D1 is dividend in year 1 or the next dividend
- r is the required rate of return
Plugging in the available values for P0, D1 and r, we can calculate the value of g.
82 = 4.65 / (0.109 - g)
82 * (0.109 - g) = 4.65
8.938 - 82g = 4.65
8.938 - 4.65 = 82g
4.288 = 82g
g = 4.288 / 82
g = 0.05229 or 5.229% rounded off to 5.23%
Answer:
i=4.84%
Explanation:
the key to answer this question, is to remember the model of return for a perpeuity dividend calculation:
where value is the current stock price, i is the dividend yield and k is the growth rate, so applying to this particular case we have
k=3.4/91
k=3.74%
and solving i for the previous formula:
Answer:
1. per se application
U.S. Competition Law
This law checks whether certain parts of a contract or agreement have violated US antitrust laws.
2. Misuse of activity
EU Competition Law
This is part of the European Union's competition law that prohibits the use of activity to try to gain unfair advantges.
3. Extraterritoriality
US and EU
This is a provision in both US and EU anti-competition and anti-trust laws that states that the activities of foreign companies fall under the law if these activities influence the people within the jurisdiction of the US or the EU.
4. Trade obstacle, nontariff
France
These are a part of the French system.
5. Strict liability
U.S. Tort Law
A concept in US Tort law that states that a person is liable for an offence they committed and their state of mind or intent when they committed said offence is irrelevant.
6. Punitive damages
U.S. Product Liability Law
A concept in the US that allows for the extra punishment of the party in the wrong to dissuade others from doing so and to reward the party in the right more justly.
