The answers that fit the blanks provided are ECONOMIC and TRANSACTION, respectively. Based on the given scenario above regarding Atlanta company, and Phoenix company, we can say that Atlanta company is more exposed on the economic perspective, and Phoenix company is more exposed on the transaction perspective.
Question (in proper order)
If the simple CAPM is valid and all portfolios are priced correctly, which of the situations below is possible? Consider each situation independently, and assume the risk-free rate is 5%.
A)
Portfolio Expected Return Beta
A 11 % 1.1
Market 11 % 1.0
B)
Portfolio Expected Return Standard Deviation
A 14 % 11 %
Market 9 % 19 %
C)
Portfolio Expected Return Beta
A 14 % 1.1
Market 9 % 1.0
D)
Portfolio Expected Return Beta
A 17.6 % 2.1
Market 11 % 1.0
Option A
Option B
Option C
Option D
Answer and Explanation:
A) As Per CAPM
Expected Return = Risk free rate + Beta × (Market Return - Risk free Rate)
= 5% + 1.1 × (11% - 5%)
= 11.60%
(Portfolio is not correctly Priced)
B) Standard Deviation alone cannot determine expected return using CAPM
C) As Per CAPM
Expected Return = Risk free rate + Beta × (Market Return - Risk free Rate)
= 5% + 1.1 × (9% - 5%) = 9.40%
(Portfolio is not correctly Priced)
D) As Per CAPM
Expected Return = Risk free rate + Beta × (Market Return - Risk free Rate)
= 5% + 2.1 × (11% - 5%) = 17.60%
Required Rate and Expected Return of Portfolio are Same
(Portfolio is correctly Priced)
Option D is correct option
Answer:
Ebon's explicit costs are $140,000
Explanation:
Explicit costs are all those which is directly paid to operate the business like wages, material etc. On the other hand implicit cost is the opportunity cost to choose and alternative.
Economic profit is the net of Revenue, Implicit and explicit costs.
Economic profit = Revenue - Explicit cost - Implicit costs
As we know salary earning of the let job is opportunity cost.
$10,000 = $175,000 - Explicit cost - $25,000
$10,000 = $150,000 - Explicit cost
Explicit cost = $150,000 - $10,000 = $140,000
The true economic yield produced by an asset is summarized by the asset's<u> internal rate of return.</u>
<h3>
What is internal rate of return?</h3>
- In financial analysis, the internal rate of return (IRR) is a statistic used to calculate the profitability of possible investments. IRR is a discount rate that, in a discounted cash flow analysis, reduces all cash flows' net present values (NPV) to zero.
- The same formula is used for NPV calculations and IRR calculations. Remember that the project's true financial value is not represented by the IRR.
- The annual return is what brings the NPV to a negative value. The more attractive an investment is to make, the greater the internal rate of return.
- IRR can be used to rank numerous potential investments or projects on a pretty even basis because it is consistent for investments of different types.
To learn more about internal rate of return with the given link
brainly.com/question/13016230
#SPJ4