The Greek civilization was basically maritime, commercial and expansive. A historical reality in which the geographic component played a crucial role to the extent that the physical characteristics of the southern Balkan peninsula made it difficult for agricultural activity and internal communications, while its long coastal length favored its expansion towards overseas .
A phenomenon that would also have a substantial impact on the demographic pressure caused by the successive waves of peoples (among them the Achaeans, the Ionians and the Dorians) who invaded and occupied the Hellas throughout the III and II millennium BC.
The first Greeks were organized into family clans. Over time, the clans allied and formed communities, although they were separated from each other due to the mountainous relief of the region. This favored their becoming independent territories with their own government and army. In ancient Greek those populations were called polis. Despite sharing essentially the same geographical space, language and culture, the political organization of the polis was very diverse, including a wide range of systems of government, ranging from tyranny to democracy. The polis were the true political unit, with its institutions, customs and laws.
It seems that at first many Greek city-states were minor kingdoms; many times there was a municipal official who performed the king's duties. Later, most of these city-states had already become aristocratic oligarchies. It is not known how this change happened.
Athens fell under a tyranny in the second half of the sixth century BC. When this tyranny ended, the Athenians founded the first democracy in the world. An assembly of citizens for the discussion of municipal policy and all citizens were allowed to attend. By establishing democracy, the assembly became the mechanism of government; all citizens then had equal rights in the assembly.
In the "person-situation debate" amongst psychologists, Traits are a false notion. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be beneficial to examine how they respond differently in particular circumstances.
<h3>Which side of the person-situation argument did Mischel take?</h3>
In the psychological community's "person-situation argument," Walter Mischel played a significant role. Character traits are a myth. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be useful to examine the various responses in particular circumstances.
<h3>What exactly is the person-situation argument?</h3>
Nature versus. nurture argument in personality psychology concerns which factor, a person or an environment, is more crucial in predicting what people will do. There is too much variation in behavior across contexts for attributes to adequately describe individual variations.
Learn more about psychologists here:-
brainly.com/question/28321133
#SPJ4
Answer:
change in demand and change in quantity demanded have two pretty different meanings.
Explanation:
change in demand is meaning there is a change it what people may need at the moment but change in quantity demanded is referring to how much they may need of a certain thing
Answer:
i think all the people of the city and locality are responsible for taking steps to improve my locality and city.
