Plz translate, I’m not very flaunt in Spanish
Answer:
A. Stated in broad terms to allow for flexibility
Explanation:
During the briefing, incident objectives will be presented to all the person involved as the main goal of the operation.
Flexibility<em><u> is allowed in finding methods /ways to achieve</u></em> the goals , BUT <u><em>flexibility cannot be allowed in determining the goal itself. \</em></u>
<em> </em>Stating the objectives in broad terms to allow flexibility only create the risk of confusion, which make team members have different ideas of what needed to be achieved.
To ensure that all the team members work harmoniously, objectives need to be Logically attainable, can be measured by a specific standard, include time frame that specify when the objectives needed to be done, and it also need to stay within the commander's jurisdiction.
Answer: When it comes tostarting those touchy conversations, she recommends being proactive and using clear communication and “I-statements” to be most effective.As a counselor, she also encourages journaling about feelings or writing letters that you wouldn’t necessarily plan to send if you’re not yet ready to talk the your friend or partner directly.
Answer:
condition of probation
Explanation:
Based on how the situation is described in the question, we can say that wearing an ankle bracelet is a condition of probation. This can be said based on the fact that in order to stay out of jail on probation Jeremy needs to keep his ankle bracelet on at all times otherwise he goes back to jail. This is considered as a "condition".
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
It was a civil case. Snoozer was seeking compensation for the loss of her birds.
Explanation:
A jury has the responsibility of making the decision if, on the facts presented in the case, an individual is guilty or not guilty of the crime being charged. The verdict is reached after evidence has been produced and presented in court to allow the judge take a stand. In this case, Snoozer was seeking the compensation for loss of the birds that were missing.
