I believe the answer is Corpus delicti but I'm not certain.
When a country is more specialized, it's able to make something or know how to make something better. If two countries are specialized in different areas, they can each trade their advanced goods instead of each country making moderately good products.
The answer is Uganda because they have an autocratic government, and citizens under an autocratic government have little participation with the government.
hopefully my answer helps you
“El desarrollo integral es el nombre general que se le da a una serie de políticas que trabajan en conjunto para fomentar el desarrollo sostenible tanto en los países en desarrollo como en los subdesarrollados. Debido a que el tema del desarrollo se ha vuelto tan esencial en los últimos años, especialmente a medida que las naciones del mundo se vuelven más integradas e interconectadas, la OEA tiene una secretaría completa dedicada a esta área. La Secretaría Ejecutiva para el Desarrollo Integral trabaja para apoyar, facilitar y promover el desarrollo integral de los Estados miembros en coordinación con medidas para fortalecer la democracia, la seguridad multidimensional y la promoción de los derechos humanos.”
Answer:
No, it definitely was not pure racism.
Explanation:
While individuals who have pure hatred and racist views against other groups of people have always existed, during the centuries that slavery existed, not everyone who owned slaves or supported slavery justified their position on the basis of racist arguments.
Very often, these arguments in favor of racism were made from an economic point of view. They justified slavery because slavery was fundamental for their economic well-being. Some people even justified slavery under supposedly moral, ethical, or religious reasons, arguing that slaves were better off under the control of their owners, or that some religious scripture justified slavery.