It is false, because the law is based on core ideas of ethics, actually. In common law, cases are determined with the help of the past decisions. Those decisions are also based on past decisions and so on. It shows that timeline doesn't matter; what matters is just the rules and principles of law.
Human right violations can happen all the time. For example, if a police officer demands to search a persons house with a warrant, it is a violation of their rights. Everyone has rights and anybody can violate them at any time. Even though this is wrong, there is not much of a punishment towards this.
Answer: Representative Ness Heuristic
Explanation: Representative Heuristic is usually employed when the need to make relatively quick decision occurs and therefore relying on the most readily available mental information to guide our decision. The representative Heuristic relies on using a prototype or something very synonymous to the observation or decision to be made. In most cases, decisions of this sort are usually incorrect. In the scenario above, the representative Heuristic was employed as the teachers perception or guess was guided by the direction from which the ball rolled. The direction of the ball was used as prototype which influenced the teacher's decision to conclude it was the boy on the same row.
The answer is: <span>the directionality problem
</span><span>the directionality problem refers to a type of problem in which the cause and effect relationship is not known.But even though the relationship is not known, we can now for sure that the problem is exist because it shows obvious effect/symtomps.</span>
Answer:
On Cherokee land and led to settler demands for the Cherokees’ removal
