Answer:
Divergent thinking
Explanation:
divergent thinking is using a cognitive process (a mode of critical thinking) that generates many unique, creative responses to a single question or problem.
The key differences between Mesopotamian and Archaic Greek outlooks is that Mesopotamians believed in an afterlife, and they focused on their lives before death, but the Archaic Greek spent the high of their focusing on the afterlife.
<h3>How are The Epic of Gilgamesh and Homer's Iliad similar?</h3>
The key similarity is one that can be seen between the characters, that are found in Gilgamesh and Achilles of Homer.
Both text were said to have been made up of great and mighty warriors and were said to be partly human and divine. They both were said to have gone in search of immortality and they were also sons of goddesses and men.
Learn more about Epic of Gilgamesh from
brainly.com/question/1462971
<span>The
argument which critics used in that time to support revising the Articles of
Confederation was that the central government lacks power or lack of centralized
government power. The previous Article of Confederation allowed the states to
hold most of the power, and the central government was too weak to even
function properly. Due to this there was also huge difference in terms of
economics from state to state.</span>
The answer is no because seeds need air and you don't have air in your stomach.
Answer:
- <u><em>D. No, because $100,000 is much greater than the values used in the experiment.</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
Explanation:
<em>Correlations</em>, when have strong correlation coefficients, which r = 0.9 is, may be good predictors within the limits of the range of the data.
Trying to extrapolate the <em>linear relationship</em> between the variables, <em>x = advertising spending and y= product sales</em>, way beyond the limits of the data used for the study, is too risky, because the data may be linear just for some stages (ranges) but behave very different in other ranges.
As, the option D. states, <em>$100,000 is much greater that the values used in the experiment</em>; hence, the correlation would likely would not be a good predictor for that input.