1. A) Because you don't want to be stuck living with your parents until you are 30
2. B) Living and educational expenses
Reason: 
I took a test very similar to this a few days ago, and I am a straight-A student.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
a. Does this qualify as a good Section 351 transaction?
Answer: No. This is because service is not a qualified property contribution under the section 321. Moreover, fair value of stock received by Chrissie is just 75% of 100%.
b. What gain does Chrissie Recognize?
Answer: The Gain Chrissie recognizes = FMV of stock received - Adjusted basis of transferred property = $750,000 - $500,000 = $250,000.
c. What gain does Mirinda recognize?
Answer: The Gain Mirinda recognizes is $0 or Mirinda will recognizes compensation worth which will be taxed as an ordinary Income ($250,000).
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The answer is: $225,000
Explanation:
Ford should include a total gain of $225,000 in its income statement. 
That gain is the result of the difference between the carrying value of the asset (land) and the carrying value of the liability (debt note). 
$425,000 - $200,000 = $225,000 as total gain
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Firstly in a long arm resolution, it requires the damage to be occurred inside the state, in the event of individual damage activities.  
In the event that the defendant’s executes any business inside the state or agreements anyplace to supply products and enterprises inside the state than the cases emerging from this are amiable to jurisdiction and test for exchange is subjective. Along these lines an agreement of guaranteeing any individual, property inside the state has the option to present locale.  
So here, Florida had individual locale over the defendant where the defendant had marked the long haul contract with the offended party. So the Florida law would apply right now, the court discovered there was sufficient to build up close to home locale in Florida as observed by the defendant’s educated and deliberate contacts with Florida partnership.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer: not at all
Explanation:
not enough information to advise “negative” or “positive”