Answer:
B. Argument.
i think that's the answer.
Okay i got you, jus add me back
Answer:
The correct answer is option C. It is too vague.
Explanation:
The above sentence is ineffective because it is too vague. The reason is because it states some facts that do not entail anything. It does not say anything about how and for what have this person is qualified. And secondly it fails to explain the strengths and skills he portrayed and learned through the previous job due to which he was a good worker.
Therefore option C. It is too vague is the answer.
This is True. If you are referring to an author about whom you had previously written in the paragraph, you are allowed to omit the name from the parentheses.
The answer would either be A or C sorry if i'm incorrect
