Answer:
Indian Removal Act
Explanation:
The Indian Removal Act was a law enacted by President Andrew Jackson. Although this was sanctioned with the claim that it would protect Native Americans, it did allow the president to expel natives located east of the Mississippi River and compel them to live in the west of that same river. It was through this law that the state of Oklahoma was created and served as a settlement for several different indigenous peoples, who had their lands stolen by the government. However, some indigenous wheat had their removal negotiated, but the majority were compulsorily withdrawn.
More People = More Buildings, which means more country being built over, with the outcome being the environment has been affected by globalisation.
The Middle Colonies were more diverse than colonies in New England and the South. Most of the early settlers depended on the fur trade and on farming for economic survival. The most populous of the Middle colonies was Pennsylvania, other colonies were settled rather haphazardly over the course of the 17th century. Settlers usually organized themselves in small farms spread throughout the colony with a few cities added to the mix.
<span>The Middle Colonies were not as cohesive as the New England colonies because colonists in this region were not united by single religion or code of beliefs.Area dominated by larger farms than N.E., smaller than the S.; still there is an emphasis on subsistence rather than cash crops. Settlement patterns generally revolve around single family farms (around 50 -150 acres). Again you see the predominance of servant (as opposed to slave labor) in the 17th century. [A notable exception is in New York where you see a large number of African Americans in the colony, especially in New York city where blacks are employed in commercial settings and as dockworkers.]<span>The Middle Colonies were settled by different nationalities so there is greater emphasis on religious toleration and cultural diversity. This is especially true in the colony of New York.</span></span>
Reason:
- After the Soviet Red Army was about to defeat Nazi Germany, the US side wanted to more clearly shape its important role in ending World War 2.
- America decided to defeat the Japanese army and did not want to lose many soldiers. Therefore, the country decided to use nuclear weapons
- Through atomic weapons, the United States believes that a nuclear bomb will not only help defeat Japanese forces but also show the world about its horrific weapons of destruction.
Consequence:
- About 135,000 people in Hiroshima died immediately after the atomic bomb exploded. In Nagasaki, about 40,000 people died shortly after the US bomb dropped.
Answer: Until that moment, no more destructive war has been waged on American soil.
Explanation:
Of all the wars leading up to that moment, the French - Indian war was the most destructive. In this context, reference should be made to the population at that time to make sense of the preceding statement.
In the most destructive war in the history of British settlements, 12 cities were destroyed. Economic and trade flows were halted, and dozens of able-bodied settlers were killed. The conflict between the Indians and the French lasted just over a year.