Answer:
Ah, I remember this! It's the answer "Herbie was dreaming during REM sleep".
Materials that naturally break down by shooting away<span> parts of </span>their atoms<span>. </span>atomic<span> age. a period of history when </span>the<span> study of </span>atoms<span> led to a new science and a new bomb. Einstein. a famous scientist who figured out that tiny </span>atoms<span> contain huge amounts of energy. uranium. </span>the<span> radioactive </span>material<span> used to fuel </span>the atom<span> bomb</span><span> </span>
Explanation:
According to the first constitutional amendment to the "Bill of Rights", an individual have the right to destroy or burn the American flag in a rally or in a protest against the government. The State considering a bill to ban the people from flag desecration would possibly be violating the people freedom of speech and freedom of action under the first amendment.
But in contrast, Citizens Flag Alliance publishing an article on their website favoring the proposed policy may be considered that they may find the destruction of the American flag to be unpatriotic or not in the favor of the nation.
They support this idea because consider the flag a national symbol of importance. So they support the government's proposal to ban people from flag destruction and try to influence the public in support of them. They may also carry out a mass rally in support of the bill so as to influence the Congressmen.
Answer:
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954),[1] was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality. Handed down on May 17, 1954, the Court's unanimous (9–0) decision stated that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal", and therefore violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. However, the decision's 14 pages did not spell out any sort of method for ending racial segregation in schools, and the Court's second decision in Brown II (349 U.S. 294 (1955)) only ordered states to desegregate "with all deliberate speed".
The Browns and twelve other local black families in similar situations then filed a class action lawsuit in U.S. federal court against the Topeka Board of Education, alleging that its segregation policy was unconstitutional. A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas rendered a verdict against the Browns, relying on the precedent of the Supreme Court's 1896 decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, in which the Court had ruled that racial segregation was not in itself a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause if the facilities in question were otherwise equal, a doctrine that had come to be known as "separate but equal". The Browns, then represented by NAACP chief counsel Thurgood Marshall, appealed to the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case.
The Court's decision in Brown partially overruled Plessy v. Ferguson by declaring that the "separate but equal" notion was unconstitutional for American public schools and educational facilities.[note 1] It paved the way for integration and was a major victory of the civil rights movement,[4] and a model for many future impact litigation cases.[5]
In the Southern United States, especially the "Deep South", where racial segregation was deeply entrenched, the reaction to Brown among most white people was "noisy and stubborn".[6] Many Southern governmental and political leaders embraced a plan known as "Massive Resistance", created by Virginia Senator Harry F. Byrd, in order to frustrate attempts to force them to de-segregate their school systems. Four years later, in the case of Cooper v. Aaron, the Court reaffirmed its ruling in Brown, and explicitly stated that state officials and legislators had no power to nullify its ruling.
Explanation:
open this helps if not sorry:(:)