Answer:
Un problema ambiental es un cambio que ha tenido lugar o se está produciendo en el medio ambiente que una persona encuentra problemático por alguna razón. Normalmente, solo los cambios provocados por el hombre se consideran problemas ambientales: los desastres naturales como terremotos o tormentas, por ejemplo, generalmente no se consideran problemas ambientales. Los problemas ambientales actuales a menudo se consideran relacionados, entre otras cosas, con el consumo excesivo y la superpoblación, el agotamiento de los recursos, la industrialización, la desigualdad y la pobreza, la ignorancia o la tecnología subdesarrollada.
Los fenómenos comunes considerados problemas ambientales incluyen el cambio climático, la eutrofización, el agotamiento del ozono, la erosión, la acidificación del suelo y el agua, la contaminación ambiental y el agotamiento de la biodiversidad, por ejemplo en forma de extinciones de especies.
Answer:
the 8 in 80 is 10 times greater than the 8 in 80
Explanation:
The statement "Transnational organized crime is a conspiratorial activity, involving the coordination of numerous people" is true.
<h3>What is Transnational organized crime?</h3>
Transnational organized crime can be defined as the type of crime in which different people that lived in different state or country plan to venture into business that are illegal.
This group of people execute their plan after planning it by commiting different altrocities or by involving in different criminal acts.
Therefore the statement is true.
Learn more about Transnational organized crime here:brainly.com/question/3661630
Helpppp me nowww I need this answer ASAP
Answer:
<em>I can see that there are no choices.</em>
fallacy of bandwagon
Explanation:
A "logical fallacy" refers to the error of reasoning or logical gap that makes an argument invalid.
The situation above commits the fallacy of the bandwagon because the argument is being supported only according to a significant number of population. This is a fallacy because it doesn't necessarily mean all of the retired persons are unhappy about the level of Social Security assistance due to the opinion of 30 persons who agreed that they were unhappy. It becomes a "standalone justification" of the validity of an argument. We cannot judge the happiness or unhappiness of all retired persons according only to a group of 30 persons <em>(even though they were chosen from different parts of the country). </em>
So, this explains the answer.
