Answer:
Expected Loss will be $3
Explanation:
Expected Loss can be calculated by multiplying the probabilities to Net expected outcome.
Probabilities
Prize ( $460) = 1 / 100
Prize ( $80 ) = 2 / 100
Prize ( $20 ) = 4 / 100
No prize = 100/100 - (1+2+4)/100 = 93/100
Expected value = [( 460 - 10 ) x 1/100 ] + [( 80 - 10 ) x 2/100 ] + [( 20 - 10 ) x 4/100 ] + [( 0 - 10 ) x 93/100] = 4.5 + 1.4 + 0.4 - 9.3 = -$3
The total sales-mix variance in terms of the contribution margin is $2,60,000 favorable.
The contribution margin is computed because of the promoting charge per unit, minus the variable fee per unit. Also called dollar contribution consistent with the unit, the degree shows how a particular product contributes to the overall earnings of the company.
Contribution margin, or dollar contribution consistent with the unit, is the promoting charge according to the unit minus the variable value in keeping with the unit. "Contribution" represents the part of income revenue that is not fed on with the aid of variable expenses and so contributes to the insurance of fixed expenses.
The closer a contribution margin percent, or ratio, is to a hundred%, the higher. The higher the ratio, the extra cash is available to cover the enterprise's overhead costs or fixed costs. However, it is much more likely that the contribution margin ratio is properly under 100%, and in all likelihood beneath 50%.
Learn more about contribution margin here brainly.com/question/24039258
#SPJ4
Answer:
See Below
Explanation:
Expected value is the sum of the products of the probability and payoff of each.
<u>Wager 1:</u>
probability of heads and tails, both is 0.5
Win = 440
Loose = 110
So,
Expected Value = 440(0.5) + (-110)(0.5) = 220 - 55 = $165
<u>Wager 2:</u>
Similar to wager 1
Win = 770
Loose = 220
So,
Expected value = 770(0.5) + (-220)(0.5) = 385 - 110 = $275
2nd wager is better, in this sense.
Answer:
59% - a)increase - b)decrease
Explanation:
First of all, we should say that the real exchange rate is calculated by multiplying the nominal exchange rate for the price index and then divide it by the price index of the other country. In another language, using this case as the example, the first nominal exchange rate is 50, as you need 50 rupees to buy 1 dollar. So to calculate the real exchange rate you need to multiply 50 by 100 (the price index of USA) and then divide it by 100 (the price index of India). Note that both price indexes are 100, just a coincidence for making easier the question. Result: 50.
Then we calculate the next real exchange rate: multiply 60 (the new nominal exchange rate) by 106 (the new US price index) and divide by 80 (the new India price index). This throws a result of 79,5. We see a 29,5 increase, and 29,5 represents 59% of 50 (the initial real exchange rate).
Then both questions is more common sense than the reading of the results we just calculated. For example, nominal exchange rate changed from 50 to 60, so the people in India will now have to collect 10 more rupees to buy the same dollar. Let's suppose a pair of shoes in USA costs 40 dollars. Before, Indians needed 2000 rupees to buy it. Now they will need 2400 rupees... it will be more expensive. Plus, the prices of USA had gone up 6%, which means the pair of shoes will now cost 42,4 dollars... even more expensive! As products in USA are more expensive, we can expect that India's consumption of American goods will decrease (law of demand).
With the American consumption of Indian goods happens the opposite, the goods in India became cheaper (price index has fallen), and for the Americans, the same dollars they had will buy more rupees when the exchange rate changed to 60.
