Answer:
A. $41,120.
Explanation:
Year Description Cash flow Present [email protected]%
0 Equipment cost ($30,000) ($30,000)
1-4 Additional CF $24,000 $69,929.10
4 Residual value $2,000 $1,184.16
Present value total $41,113.26
Based on the above calculation, the answer shall be A. $41,120.
Answer:
Authorized the president to sell, transfer, lend, lease, or otherwise dispose of other equipment and supplies to any country whose defense the President deems vital to the defense of the United States.
Explanation:
Lend-Lease Act
This bill was said to come into existence on 11th of March, 1941. The Congress passed the Lend-Lease Act. The legislation gave the President at that time, President Franklin D. Roosevelt the right, powers to sell, transfer, exchange, lend equipment to any country to help it defend itself against the other powers.
It was said that with the Lend-Lease bill stated that country of any kind whose defense the President thinks is very important to the defense of the United States will be given or can be able to receive military equipment, supplies, and other necessary materials even if that country is unable to generate funds to pay for those items.
Umhow are we supposed to help u with this?
Answer:
c. a debit to Inventory for $10,000
Explanation:
Whenever goods are purchased on a discount to be received on payment basis, the inventory is first recorded at cost.
Also as per the general rule, discount is a kind of income, and incomes are recorded only when earned, therefore, the cost of inventory shall be reduced by 4% only when the payment is made, therefore the inventory on the date of purchase shall be recorded at $10,000 only and not for $9,600.
Thus, correct option is c
Hello,
Question - The U.S. Supreme Court case United States v. Bagley compels the prosecution to disclose any evidence that the _________ requests.
Answer - "evidence that the defense requests"
Why - "Bagley claimed that the government had violated his due process rights by withholding evidence that the defense could have utilized to impeach the witnesses. The district court held that the evidence was not material because the outcome would have been the same. "
