Answer:
First project
Explanation:
The 2 options/ project been considered:
1. Buying 10% of shares in a publicly traded american company that owns five power generation units in Pakistan
2. To be partner with equal share with one private company in building a new power generation unit in Pakistan
The first option/project would have a higher required return because:
<em>- This company is already settled in the country having five power generation units in Pakistan. All these units are running and making profit.</em>
<em>- Investment Option 2 is high riskier as we do not know the details of the new company and there are so many unforeseen circumstances surrounding establishing such project in the company. It will also take time to establish in order to start make it profitable.</em>
Answer:
The correct answer is: Emotional contagion.
Explanation:
The emotional state of an individual can be affected by the exposure to emotional expressions of others around which means that the emotional state can be transferred from one person to another even in online interactions through a process called emotional contagion.
Emotional contagion implies an individual connecting its emotions to others' moods which is likely to be reflected in both parties' behavior.
Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
It is False that the difference between operations and projects is that operations end when their objectives have been reached, whereas projects do not.
The reverse is true because projects are time-bound and they come to an end when their objectives have been achieved, but company operations are expected to continue as a going concern.
A project is an activity to meet the creation of a unique product or service, an thereafter terminates while operations are day to day routine activities that are expected to continue
Answer: Please refer to Explanation.
Explanation:
Two Companies. We shall call them A and B.
If A and B decide not to advertise, they both get $5,000,000.
If A advertises and B does not then A captures $3 million from B at a cost of $2 million meaning their payoff would be,
= 5 million - 2 million + 3 million
= $6 million.
A will have $6 million and B will have $2 million as $3 million was captured from them. This scenario holds true if B is the one that advertises and A does not.
If both of them Advertise, they both reduce their gains by $2 million while capturing $3 million from each other so they'll essentially both have just $3 million if they both decide to advertise.
With the above scenarios, it is better for both companies to ADVERTISE if there is NO COLLUSION. This is because it ensures that they do not get the lowest payoff of $2 million if the other company decides to advertise and they do not.
However, if they DO COLLUDE. They must both decide that NONE of them SHOULD ADVERTISE and this would leave them with their original $5 million each which is a higher payoff than the $3 million they will both receive if they were both advertising.
Answer:
Select the course of action
Explanation:
Because it’s the next step after collecting relevant information and evaluating each alternatives