1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hodyreva [135]
3 years ago
14

How is the Declaration of Independence structured ?

English
2 answers:
Alex787 [66]3 years ago
6 0
The declaration of independence is structured is declaration is a legal meaning that it was signed by delegates to Congress and once signed it was considered a law this document was a way for colonies to become <span>an  <span>independen t</span>nation</span>.
vitfil [10]3 years ago
4 0
<span>The Declaration of Independence is structured in five fundamental parts: Introduction, the Preamble, the Charge of George III, the Denunciation of the British, and the Conclusion. The Introduction contains statements stating that people have the ability to assume political independence under Natural Law. Followed by the Preamble which contains the summary of the general philosophy of government that justifies a revolution when the government damages natural rights. The Accusation is a list of "repeated insults and usurpations." The Denunciation, speaks of the end of the case of independence. The Conclusion shows that the signatories affirm that there are conditions under which the people must change their government, and it is necessary that the colonies announce their separation and dissolve their ties with the British crown. Firmantes, the first and famous signature in the official version is John Hancock, the president of the Continental Congress. Two future presidents, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, are signatories.</span>
You might be interested in
(repost) SOMEBODYYY HELPPPPP!!! someone calls the collective grouping of all citizens the "sovereign," and claims that it should
Anastasy [175]

Answer: In a sense yes because the people are one but individually they shouldn’t be judged by what others are doing

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
IDENTIFYING AND REVISING SENTENCE FRAGMENT
Elan Coil [88]

Answer:

1. In an interesting article about vandalism against works of art.

This is a sentence fragment. It is a missing a subject and a predicate. In this context, we are missing this information: What can be found in this article? For example, we can modify this sentence with:

You are mentioned in an interesting article about vandalism against works of art.

In an interesting article about vandalism against works of art, <em>Jonathan found the inspiration for his next artwork.  </em>

2. The motives of the vandals varying widely.

Though at first glance it might seem like a complete sentence, this sentence is actually a fragment: It is lacking a predicate. Varying here is not a predicate, it is an adjective, describing the motives of the vandals. We are missing information such as: In what context do the motives vary? Some possible way of completing these sentences are:

Investigation into art vandalism has found that most of the vandals are not ashamed of their actions, with <em>the motives of the vandals varying widely.</em>

With the motives of the vandals varying widely,<em> it can be difficult to devise a way to stop the perpetrators of these crimes using only one method.  </em>

3. Those who harm artwork are usually angry.

<u>This is a complete sentence</u>. You can find the subject (those), the predicate (are), and a clear thought process (who harm artwork).  

4. But not necessarily at the artist or the owner.

This is a sentence fragment. We are missing information about what is happening that involves the artist or the owner. We can find subjects here (the artist or the owner), but we are lacking a coherent thought process and the verb. Also, the fact that there is a conjunction ‘but’, means that this fragment is a dependent clause. Some ways of completing these are:

Those who harm artwork are usually angry, but not necessarily at the artist or the owner.

5. For instance, a man who hammered at Michelangelo's Pietà.

This is a sentence fragment. It is missing a predicate, and the use of for instance, implies that it is not a complete sentence. A way to complete this sentence would be, for example:

For instance, a man who hammered at Michelangelo's Pietà <em>was arrested two years ago for a similar crime done to Michelangelo’s David.  </em>

6. And knocked off the Virgin Mary's nose.

Again, this is a sentence fragment, since we are missing a predicate, and there is a conjunction word used within the sentence (and). The addition of a few more words can complete the sentence, such as:

<em>He punched </em>and knocked off the Virgin Mary’s nose <em>because he was enraged by its depiction.</em><em>  </em>

7. Because he was angry at the Roman Catholic Church.

This is a sentence fragment. We have the subject (he) and the predicate (was), but because there was a conjunction (because), we need another phrase to make the clause a complete sentence. This is a dependent clause – missing an independent one. A way to complete this clause, for example, would be:

<em>He shouted at the priest</em> because he was angry at the Roman Catholic Church.  

8. Which knew nothing of his grievance.

We can see that the sentence is missing a subject, a verb, and a clear thought that can assemble these words into a complete sentence. From the missing parts, we can conclude that this is a sentence fragment. The use of which also tells us that this is a clause. Thus, we need to add a subject, a verb, and a phrase that can complete this sentence – for example:

<em>The statue,</em> which knew nothing of his grievance, <em>became damaged in the process, costing an exorbitant amount for its restoration.  </em>

9. Although many damaged works can be repaired.

Though this sentence has a subject and a verb, we can see that there is the word ‘although’ here, which is a form of conjunction – also known as subordinating conjunction. We can deduce then that this isn’t an independent clause – this is a dependent clause. To be concise: This is a fragment sentence. To repair this sentence, we can do this:

Although many damaged works can be repaired, <em>it would take quite some time for the work to be made public again.  </em>

10. Usually even the most skillful repairs are forever visible.

<u>This is a complete sentence.</u> The word usually here refers to adverb of frequency – which can stand alone in a sentence; not serving as a conjunction to an independent clause. We can see this since it is possible to move the word to the middle of the sentence (“Even the most skillful repairs are usually forever visible”). Thus, there is no need to revise this sentence.  

8 0
3 years ago
G
Serggg [28]

The correct answer is B. It allows the phone to detect the speaker so they can be paired.

Explanation

In the text are listed the steps to pair the Bluetooth speaker with the cell phone. This text is an informative text that allows the reader to know how to perform the pairing process of these two devices. According to the above, each of the steps has the purpose of explaining a specific step to the user. In the case of step 5, the objective of this step is not specified, however, it can be inferred since this would allow the cell phone to detect the speaker much faster, and it would also prevent the cell phone from recognizing a different speaker than the one that the user wants to pair. Therefore, the correct answer is B. It allows the phone to detect the speaker so they can be paired.

5 0
3 years ago
Why doesn’t Proctor go to Salem to report what Abigail has told him? Why does Elizabeth want him to go?
LiRa [457]

Answer:Why doesn't proctor go to Salem to report what Abigail has told him? He is afraid that if he reveals Abigail to be a fraud, she will confess their affair.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read the excerpt from The Crisis, Number I by Thomas Paine. “Not all the treasures of the world, so far as I believe, could have
kvv77 [185]
When reading this excerpt I understood authors intentions, I bet, in full measure. As he mentioned - the war is murder, thousands of people fighting for particular idea and nothing can't stop them, neither moral issues nor ethical rules. All these people are guilties of a global crime and author at any price will not support such events. Unlikely that all of these people will be punished for their mistakes or sins they have made, but if we will talk about regular crime, such as author described in the text - this actions must be sentenced to justice.
So I choose this option : 
<span>B.Paine says that war is terrible, and ordinarily nothing could have convinced him to support it. However, he also believes that if a person or group commits severe crimes against him, that party should be punished, no matter who they are.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Hubbard Brothers need $75,000.00 to invest in the cotton mill.
    9·1 answer
  • Which fraction belongs in the box to make the expression true? 1/4 &lt; ___&lt; 7/8.
    13·1 answer
  • Based on your understanding of parallel structure, how does Chang use it?
    14·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP PLEASE
    9·1 answer
  • Great Answers :) Last Question!
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following are characteristics of a credible source
    13·2 answers
  • Please help me with this homework
    13·1 answer
  • Factors that influence an organism's growth that are found on the inside are called:
    12·1 answer
  • what simile does elie wiesel use to describe moishe the beadle? given the information that moishe tries to share with the people
    9·1 answer
  • identify why Tsotsi is silent for most of the chapter and how this contributes to the atmosphere in the beginning of chapter 1​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!