Granting access to a user based upon how high up he is in an organization violates "the principle of least privileges."
As the principle of least privileges states that a person should be given only those privileges that are needed or are necessary to perform a specific job or task and nothing more.
The principle of least privileges states that you assign users the minimum set of privileges which they require to do their jobs, according to their roles.
The principle of least privilege prevents the spread of malware on your network. An administrator or superuser with access to a lot of other network resources and infrastructure could potentially end up spreading malware to all those other systems which he gets access to.
Hence, if the organization grants access to a user based upon how high up he is then the organization violates the principle of least privileges.
To learn more about the least privileges here:
brainly.com/question/27034248
#SPJ4
Answer: $3,086
Explanation:
Wrote checks totaling $41,500 in
October less $39,460 of these checks cleared in October
Wrote checks totaling $45,321 in November less $44,275 cleared the bank in November
Balance of uncleared checks
In October is $41,500 - $39,460 = $2,040
In November is $45,321 - $44,275 = $1,046
Total outstanding checks on 30 Nov is $2,040+$1,046 = $3,086
Answer:
Entrepreneurship is the name given to the factor of production which performs the functions of Enterprise. In economics, Land, Labour, Capital, Organisation and Enterprise are the five factors which are thought to be the basis of all the production activities. Entrepreneurship in a broader sense can be considered as a process of action undertaken by an entrepreneur (Person) to establish his enterprise. It is a creative and innovative response to the environment. Entrepreneurship can be described as a creative and innovative response to the environment. Such responses may take place in any field of social endeavour may be business, agriculture, social work and education etc.
<h2>
Please mark me as brainliest</h2>
Answer:
Option (b) is correct.
Explanation:
This is a case of monopoly market condition where there is a single firm operating the whole market. The price of the products is set by the single firm and the buyers in this market are price taker. The monopolist can earn normal profit, losses and abnormal profit in the short run and can earn normal profit and abnormal profit in the long run.
In our case, the price of diamonds is high because there is only single firm in the whole market and there is no other competitors in the market. That's why they are charging the higher prices.
