Answer:
Yes the company must recognise the effects of this ruling.
Explanation:
As provided the law suit was initiated in the year 20x2, because of the activity happened in April 20x2.
Accordingly, company was already prepared for a liability of $100,000.
Whenever an event that occurs after the balance sheet is a mere confirmation to what was expected on balance sheet date, or is in alignment with things on record on the balance sheet date, it shall be provided in the balance sheet of that year.
In the given case the law suit was pending on the balance sheet date and was recorded as a liability then, now after the declaration by the judge, the additional liability of $20,000 shall be provided in the financial books of year 20x2.
Answer:
the extent to which a product is recognized and bought by customers in a particular market.
<span>The father of modern Russia taxed wearers of these in 1705. Only orthodox clergy were exempt from the tax. what was being taxed?
Their BEARD was being taxed.
Peter the Great wanted to follow European men in not wearing beards in order to "modernize" Russia. He imposed taxes on Russian men who opted to keep their beards rather than be clean shaven. </span>
The answer is c. 10-20 seconds
