Which statement best explains why historians use a variety of sources when exploring past events?

History

2 answers:

rusak2 [61]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

B l

Explanation:

Nikitich [7]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

D is the correct answer.

The first two are wrong because the historian's job is to find out what happened and why and how etc not to find out what some old rulers face looked like when they saw that the won the war. You can study with primary or secondary sources as long as the are credible and reliable.

They don't need to approve of some dead guys viewpoint.

D is the answer.

Explanation:

Trust me I have lots of education!

I hope you find this helpful. Please leave a review of 5 if helpful or give a thanks or mark as brainliest(if you can.)

You might be interested in

Helpppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp

Lapatulllka [165]

1. I think its Homer?
2. It’s Socrates
3. Plato!
(I hope this helps!)

8 0

2 years ago

Which of the listed powers are held by the Executive Branch?<br> Plsssss

Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

The Constitution explicitly assigns the president the power to sign or veto legislation, command the armed forces, ask for the written opinion of their Cabinet, convene or adjourn Congress, grant reprieves and pardons, and receive ambassadors.

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

The largest European city which is not actually the capital of a country is:

True [87]

Hamburg is the largest city in Europe that is not the capital of a country.

4 0

3 years ago

Which political leader represented the north?

Artemon [7]

Answer:

dfhs

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

One major reason for us involvement in latin america in the 1980’s was to

Fofino [41]

"stop the spread of Communism" since the US was still undertaking a role of communist "containment" around the globe.

7 0

3 years ago