Nothing further can be done.
<h3>
QUESTION A:</h3>
Graph B.
The information is presented most clearly here, being centered and climbing steadily which prevents the influence of bias in the presentation. As stated, his presentation is intended to be neutral.
<h3>
QUESTION B:</h3>
Graph C.
This graph tricks the human brain into thinking that the increase is less prominent than we might perceive it in Graph A or B. This is because it is located lower and has a shallower slope. The campaign that wants to prevent immediate radical action (action which would harm the native species) would want to use this one as it might convince the city counsel that the issue is not urgent enough to take such actions so quickly.
Answer: The difference is as follows:
Step-by-step explanation:
- Deductive Arguments: A deductive argument is an argument wherein it is felt that the premises give an assurance of reality of the end. In a deductive arguments, the premises are planned to offer help for the conclusion that is so strong to an extent that, if the premises are valid, it would be impossible for the conclusion to be false.
- Inductive Arguments: An inductive arguments is an arguments where it is believed that the premises provide reasons supporting the likely truth of the conclusion. In an inductive arguments, the premises are proposed distinctly to be strong to an extent that, on the off chance that they are valid, at that point it is impossible that the conclusion is false.
The contrast between the two originates from the kind of connection the author or explainer of the argument takes there to be between the premises and the conclusion. In the event that the author of the argument accepts that reality of the premises certainly sets up reality of the conclusion because of definition, l<igical entailment or scientific need, at that point the argument is deductive. In the event that the author of the argument does not feel that reality of the premises certainly sets up reality of the conclusion, however in any case accepts that their fact gives valid justification to accept the conclusion genuine, at that point the argument is inductive.
Answer:
a=69
b=133
c=116
d=93
e=86
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>first start by finding angle a:</u>
angles in a triangle add up to 180 so we can simply do 180 - 40 - 71 = 69
<u>to find b:</u>
b is on a straight line so we can do 180 - 133 = 47
<u>to find d:</u>
d is part of the small triangle on the right of the diagram, we do not know one of the angles but because it is on a straight line we can do 180-140 = 40. Now to find d we can do 180 - 47 - 40 = 93
<u>to find e:</u>
i'm assuming the large triangle containing e is isosceles so we can do 180 - 2x47 = 86
therefore c is 116 as its the only answer left - hope this helps
