1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Misha Larkins [42]
3 years ago
7

A company purchases land and a building for $300,000. The appraisal attributes a fair market value (FMV) to the land of $180,000

and to the building of $220,000. As a result, the building’s cost will be booked at:____________
Business
1 answer:
ser-zykov [4K]3 years ago
5 0
$700,000 I hope that helps
You might be interested in
I hope I can see my channel grow supporting me would be awesome I want a career in this so please all help is wanted
timama [110]

Answer:

I hope you grow and become successful you deserve it and congratulations on that much subscribers

8 0
3 years ago
Assume that your firm consists of Division 1 (40 percent of the firm) and Division 2 (60 percent of the firm). The capital struc
tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

Division 1's WACC - Division 2's WACC = 11.752% - 14.6656% = - 1.9136% or Division 1 has the lower cost of capital of 1.9136% in absolute term comparing to Division 2.

Explanation:

Before starting, we need to convert unlevered beta into levered beta:

Levered beta of Division 1: 1.2 x ( 1 + (1-40%) x 0.25) = 1.38

Leverage beta of Division 2: 1.46 x ( 1+ (1-40%) x 0.25) = 1.679

Then, we start step by step as below:

First, using the CAPM model: Cost of equity = risk-free rate of return +  beta *(Market Rate of Return – Risk-free Rate of Return) , we find the cost of equity for Division 1 and Division 2.

  - Division 1's cost of Equity = 4% + 1.38 x( 12% -4%) = 15.04%

  - Division 2's cost of equity = 4% + 1.46 x (12% - 4%) = 17.432%

Second, determine the post-tax cost of debt applied for both Division: 6% x (1-tax rate) = 6% x (1 -40%) = 3.60%

Third, calculate the WACC for each Division:

  - Division 1's WACC = % of debt in capital structure x cost of debt + % of equity in capital structure x cost of equity = 20% x 3.6% + 80% x 15.04% = 11.752%;

  - Division 2's WACC = % of debt in capital structure x cost of debt + % of equity in capital structure x cost of equity = 20% x 3.6% + 80% x 17.432% = 14.6656%;

Finally, compare the WACC between the two Division:

Division 1's WACC - Division 2's WACC = 11.752% - 14.6656% = - 1.9136% or Division 1 has the lower cost of capital of 1.9136% in absolute term comparing to Division 2.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When its sales were declining, canadian airline conducted a marketing survey to understand the expectations of the business trav
Montano1993 [528]

Answer:

The correct answer would be, The Canadian Airline would have used Lost Customer Recovery Strategy.

Explanation:

When the sales of the Canadian Airline declines, they surveyed their target market which is Business Class Travelers. From the responses of the customers, they found out that customers feel bounded by the staff of the airplane. They think that they were totally controlled by the staff on board.

Now if the Canadian Airline would have surveyed their former customers, then they would have known why they left their airline, and what was their concerns and what they want in this airline; then the strategy used by them would have Lost Customer Recovery Strategy.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is an example of the law of diminishing marginal​ returns? A. Holding capital​ constant, when the amount
Irina-Kira [14]

Answer:

The correct answer is option A.

Explanation:

The law of diminishing returns states that as we go on employing more and more unit of input while keeping other inputs constant, the return from each additional unit of input will go on declining.  

This means that the output produced from each additional unit of input will go on declining.

Here, as capital is kept constant and labor is increased by a unit, the output at first increases by 5 units from 20 to 25. But later when input is again increased by a unit, the output increase by only 3 units from 25 to 28.

This shows the law of diminishing marginal returns where the marginal returns from a unit of labor is declining.

3 0
3 years ago
Exhibit 5-2 price and quantity demanded data price quantity demanded 5 20 4 25 3 30 2 35 1 40 using exhibit 5-2, what is the pri
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

The price elasticity of demand is -5

Explanation:

Elasticity of demand measure the responsiveness of demand against the change in price of the product. It shows how much demand changes if there is the change in price.

Using mid point method

Change in Demand = $20 - $25

Change in Demand = -$5

Change in price  = $5 - $4

Change in price  = $1

As we know

Elasticity of Demand = Change in demand / Change in price

Elasticity of Demand = -$5 / $1

Elasticity of Demand = -5

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Tuck Shop began the current month with inventory costing $19,000, then purchased inventory at a cost of $52,950. The perpetu
    6·1 answer
  • 13. Average clients change their interiors every _______ years. A.2 C. 15
    5·2 answers
  • Develop an arithmetic example that illustrates how a nation could have an absolute disadvantage in the production of two goods a
    7·1 answer
  • Marcus is a self-employed marketing consultant. He is good at helping his clients with their marketing challenges; however, he i
    9·1 answer
  • College Logos buys​ logo-imprinted merchandise and then sells it to university bookstores. Sales are expected to be $ 2 comma 00
    13·1 answer
  • The market price of a bond is equal to the present value of the: Group of answer choices annuity payments plus the future value
    7·2 answers
  • When Joshua's income increases, he purchases more prime-rib dinners than he did before his income increased. For Joshua, prime-r
    13·1 answer
  • -True-False 18. All types of extinguisher can use in any kinds of fire. - True False ​
    13·1 answer
  • A federal unemployment tax is levied on
    9·1 answer
  • When analyzing segment attractiveness, one of the three factors to consider is the segment’s strategic fit to the company’s
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!