Answer:
Anton's definition is not valid.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have been given that Anton defines an acute angle as an angle that is not obtuse. We are asked to find whether Anton's definition is valid or not.
We know that an angle is known as acute angle whose measure is greater than 0 and less than 90 degrees.
We also know that an angle is known as obtuse angle whose measure is greater than 90 degrees and less than 180 degrees.
We know that a right triangle is neither acute nor obtuse. Since Anton hasn't mentioned a right triangle to his definition, therefore, his definition is not valid.
Answer:
if the question wants you to round. the answer is 4.
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x)=[x]-5
where x= 8.6
substitute 8.6 for x and you have 8.6-5= 3.6= 4
You haven't told us whether 9 and 12 are the two legs of the triangle, or whether the 12yd is the longest side.
<u>If the 9 and the 12 are the two legs, then</u>:
C² = A² + B²
C² = 81 + 144
C² = 225
C = <u>15 yd</u>
<u>If the 12 is the longest side, then</u>:
(12)² = (9)² + B²
B² = (12)² - (9)² = 144 - 81 = 63
B = √63 = <u>7.937</u>yd (rounded)
Asa you start at the angel when it’s marked and then you move to the right. it’s simple when you understand.
