1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elanso [62]
3 years ago
8

Why did the Mesopotamians trade grain and cloth for metal and stone?

History
2 answers:
GREYUIT [131]3 years ago
5 0
They traded grain and cloth for metal and stone because metal and stone were longer lasted
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

What is the main reason why the Mesopotamians traded grain and cloth for metal and stone? Metal and stone did not spoil or tear, but grain and cloth did. Metal and stone drew better prices than grain and cloth in Mesopotamia. ... Grain and cloth were lighter to carry on the ships they used to cross the seas

Explanation:

hopes this helps

Brainleist??

You might be interested in
Rencarnation into a higher or lower cast form depends on what
Reil [10]
It depends on the situation.
4 0
3 years ago
Which factor played the most significant role in the decline of the Mughal empire?
Mumz [18]
Non-Muslim citizens were outraged at the Mughal empire's implementation of sharia law.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was the answer I chose right or no? Will give brainliest
allochka39001 [22]

Answer: i think so yes

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Tell me what you know about the Great Depression. How was it different from other financial slowdowns? Then, describe how the kn
laiz [17]

Answer:

The Great Depression was the worst economic downturn in the history of the industrialized world, lasting from 1929 to 1939. By 1933, when the Great Depression reached its lowest point, some 15 million Americans were unemployed and nearly half the country's banks had failed.

8 0
3 years ago
HELP!!! Why is selective incorporation important?
Sholpan [36]

So big picture, selective incorporation, it's the doctrine where judicial decisions incorporate rights from the Bill of Rights to limit laws from states that are perceived to infringe on those rights, and the justification comes from the 14th Amendment.  It refers to the legal doctrine the U. S. Supreme Court has employed over the years to extend the rights guaranteed by the U. S. Constitution to the states. Through selective incorporation, the Court has ruled that states may not pass laws restricting many of the important rights enshrined in the Constitution.

Selective incorporation is a doctrine written into the Constitution that protects American citizens from their states' enacting of laws that could infringe upon their rights. Selective incorporation is not a law, but a doctrine that has been established and confirmed time and again by the United States Supreme Court.

The idea of selective incorporation dates to when the Constitution was being drafted, with the founding fathers heatedly debating the power of state governments versus the power of the federal government. In the end, the Constitution was signed and enacted without any definitive conclusion on the issue. In the 1833 case of Barron v. Baltimore, the Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights applied only to the federal government, meaning that states were able to pass their own laws violating the Bill of Rights without any intervention by the federal government.  It wasn't until 1868 that Congress passed the 14th Amendment, forbidding states from denying anyone the freedom to life, liberty, and property without due process, thus reversing the decision of Barron v. Baltimore.  Beginning in the 1920s, the Supreme Court ruled on many cases about the protection of the Bill of Rights within state laws. Selective incorporation is based on this approach to choosing which clauses of the Bill of Rights apply to state governments.  As the Supreme Court continued to rule on cases challenging state governments' ability to violate the Bill of Rights, justices began to debate the application of the 14th Amendment. Some felt that the amendment applied to the all amendments in the Bill of Rights, prohibiting states from the same violations as the federal government, while others felt that only portions of those basic rights should be incorporated. In the 1937 case of Palko v. Connecticut, the Court rejected total incorporation and adopted the doctrine of selective incorporation as well as the guidelines for applying it.

HOPE THIS HELPS :)

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • WILL UPVOTE EVERY ANSWER! MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION!
    13·1 answer
  • Why was the league of nations rejected by the united states
    5·2 answers
  • Select all that apply. Advantages to the United States brought about by corporations included:
    15·2 answers
  • Somalia and Sudan are two countries in _______ that have received aid from the United States in recent years.
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a job of the Preamble?
    13·2 answers
  • Summarize the United States' relationship with<br> China during the late 1800's.
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following did NOT happen during the 1950s?
    6·1 answer
  • What are the Jewish citizens wearing on their sleeves?
    10·1 answer
  • Identify the two most important rights held exclusively by U.S. citizens.
    12·1 answer
  • What statement best describes the greek city-states
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!