Many possible ways depending on the water source and your participation in the activities:
Depending on the nature ofthe water source we have to plan and conduct management activities. The activities include the sketch of the water source or knowing its topography and then assess the threats . chart out a plan and execute it. It varies from one another.
<span><span>IT IS an awful lot of rubbish. Since 1960 the amount of municipal waste being collected in America has nearly tripled, reaching 245m tonnes in 2005. According to European Union statistics, the amount of municipal waste produced in western Europe increased by 23% between 1995 and 2003, to reach 577kg per person. (So much for the plan to reduce waste per person to 300kg by 2000.) As the volume of waste has increased, so have recycling efforts. In 1980 America recycled only 9.6% of its municipal rubbish; today the rate stands at 32%. A similar trend can be seen in Europe, where some countries, such as Austria and the Netherlands, now recycle 60% or more of their municipal waste. Britain's recycling rate, at 27%, is low, but it is improving fast, having nearly doubled in the past three years.Even so, when a city introduces a kerbside recycling programme, the sight of all those recycling lorries trundling around can raise doubts about whether the collection and transportation of waste materials requires more energy than it saves. We are constantly being asked: Is recycling worth doing on environmental grounds? says Julian Parfitt, principal analyst at Waste & Resources Action Programme (WRAP), a non-profit British company that encourages recycling and develops markets for recycled materials.Studies that look at the entire life cycle of a particular material can shed light on this question in a particular case, but WRAP decided to take a broader look. It asked the Technical University of Denmark and the Danish Topic Centre on Waste to conduct a review of 55 life-cycle analyses, all of which were selected because of their rigorous methodology. The researchers then looked at more than 200 scenarios, comparing the impact of recycling with that of burying or burning particular types of waste material. They found that in 83% of all scenarios that included recycling, it was indeed better for the environment.Based on this study, WRAP calculated that Britain's recycling efforts reduce its carbon-dioxide emissions by 10m-15m tonnes per year. That is equivalent to a 10% reduction in Britain's annual carbon-dioxide emissions from transport, or roughly equivalent to taking 3.5m cars off the roads. Similarly, America's Environmental Protection Agency estimates that recycling reduced the country's carbon emissions by 49m tonnes in 2005.Recycling has many other benefits, too. It conserves natural resources. It also reduces the amount of waste that is buried or burnt, hardly ideal ways to get rid of the stuff. (Landfills take up valuable space and emit methane, a potent greenhouse gas; and although incinerators are not as polluting as they once were, they still produce noxious emissions, so people dislike having them around.) But perhaps the most valuable benefit of recycling is the saving in energy and the reduction in greenhouse gases and pollution that result when scrap materials are substituted for virgin feedstock. If you can use recycled materials, you don't have to mine ores, cut trees and drill for oil as much,says Jeffrey Morris of Sound Resource Management, a consulting firm based in Olympia, Washington.Extracting metals from ore, in particular, is extremely energy-intensive. Recycling aluminium, for example, can reduce energy consumption by as much as 95%. Savings for other materials are lower but still substantial: about 70% for plastics, 60% for steel, 40% for paper and 30% for glass. Recycling also reduces emissions of pollutants that can cause smog, acid rain and the contamination of waterways.</span></span>
Answer:
A phrase that explains why.
Explanation:
A phrase that explains why would be very helpful because the claim that you have is really just stating your opinion so you need to have at least 3 facts to support your opinion.
- You already have a phrase that states you opinion.
- The sentence that repeats the claim would come at the end of the essay.
And a sentence that argues against the claim would only be useful if you we disagreeing with the claim and trying to prove that Ramses II was <u>NOT </u> the most influential Pharaoh.
Answer:
Hunting is the seeking pursuing and capturing or kill wild animals.
Explanation:
Hunting as part of the primary education along side forestry agriculture and fishing,hunting can be means of pest control.
- Hunting also heavily contributed to the endangerment extirpation and extinction of they many animals,hunting is deeply embedded in the human culture.
- Hunting is a long history, is still vital in marginal climates those unsuited for uses agriculture activity regard hunting as cruel unnecessary and unethical.
- Hunting regulations lawful from involves the illegal killing trapping or capture of the hunted species are referred to as birds.
- Hunting state that hunting can be a component of modern management to maintain a population of healthy animals.
- Hunting sees the behavior in the middle as directly related to hunting including of language, culture and religion.
- Hunting may have been one of the multiple environmental factors leading to the extinction of replacement by smaller herbivores.
- Hunting was a crucial component of hunter societies before the dawn of agriculture in the parts of the world.
- Hunting although the varying importance of different species depended on the geographic location.
The one that you have picked is correct
