The graph shows the relationship between gravitational potential energy and mass, for objects at a height of 10 meters. What con
clusion is supported by the graph?
A) The height of an object does not affect the amount of gravitational potential energy the object has.
B) The mass of an object does not affect the amount of gravitational potential energy the object has. Eliminate
C) An object with greater mass will have less gravitational potential energy than an object with less mass, when the objects are at the same height.
D) An object with greater mass will have more gravitational potential energy than an object with less mass, when the objects are at the same height.
A) The height of an object does not affect the amount of gravitational potential energy the object has.
B) The mass of an object does not affect the amount of gravitational potential energy the object has. Eliminate
C) An object with greater mass will have less gravitational potential energy than an object with less mass, when the objects are at the same height.
D) An object with greater mass will have more gravitational potential energy than an object with less mass, when the objects are at the same height.
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information:
The null and the alternative hypothesis can be well written as:
Given that:
n = 200
x = 135
Alpha ∝ = 0.05 level of significance
Then;
⇒
= 200 × 0.6 × (1 -0.6)
= 200 × 0.6 × 0.4
= 48 ≥ 10
The sample proportion
= 0.675
The test statistics
Z = 2.165
The P-value = P(Z > 2.165)
= 1 - P(Z < 2.165)
From the z tables
= 1 - 0.9848
= 0.0152
Reject the null hypothesis since P-Value is lesser than alpha. ( i.e. 0.0152 < 0.05).
Thus, there is enough evidence to conclude that the value of the population proportion is greater than 0.6