1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Strike441 [17]
3 years ago
12

Read the excerpt from Act II of Hamlet.

English
2 answers:
kkurt [141]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

B, but read the full explanation carefully. If you have an idea of your own, pick it.

Explanation:

It's none of these. Later on we learn that they are talking about fortune and luck. Hamlet makes a very nasty comment about the nature of luck whom he sees as a changeable woman who takes money for her favors (his words not mine). Rosenkranz and Guildenstern are in the middle which leads Hamlet to make another off color observation.

Given that background, you could almost pick any one of the choices, since    none of them are correct. I suppose if you take Guildenstern's initial couplet you could pick prosperity, but I wouldn't be surprised if the writer of this question didn't pick it. The quotation is taken out of context.

Whatever they are talking about is neither the top or the bottom. It is therefore in the middle. But before this speech, we learn that the two students are not doing well. Hamlet is trying to joke with them.

AveGali [126]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

B. prosperity

Explanation:

B. prosperity

You might be interested in
5. A frustrated fan might well ask himself or herself why this happens.
Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Answer:

Hi, There! August Here! I'm Here to help you! ☆☆☆

→So the Pronoun Here Is Himself, Herself, ←

→And According to The Meaning of Antecedent The Answer would be a "Fustrated Man" ☆☆☆☆←

______________________________________________________

Hope this helps! ☆☆☆☆

4 0
3 years ago
What/where does the constitution give the president the diplomatic power?
d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer:

Explanation:

Hamilton, although he had expressed substantially the same view in The Federalist regarding the power of reception, adopted a very different conception of it in defense of Washington’s proclamation. Writing under the pseudonym, “Pacificus,” he said: “The right of the executive to receive ambassadors and other public ministers, may serve to illustrate the relative duties of the executive and legislative departments. This right includes that of judging, in the case of a revolution of government in a foreign country, whether the new rulers are competent organs of the national will, and ought to be recognized, or not; which, where a treaty antecedently exists between the United States and such nation, involves the power of continuing or suspending its operation. For until the new government is acknowledged, the treaties between the nations, so far at least as regards public rights, are of course suspended. This power of determining virtually upon the operation of national treaties, as a consequence of the power to receive public ministers, is an important instance of the right of the executive, to decide upon the obligations of the country with regard to foreign nations. To apply it to the case of France, if there had been a treaty of alliance, offensive and defensive, between the United States and that country, the unqualified acknowledgment of the new government would have put the United States in a condition to become as an associate in the war with France, and would have laid the legislature under an obligation, if required, and there was otherwise no valid excuse, of exercising its power of declaring war. This serves as an example of the right of the executive, in certain cases, to determine the condition of the nation, though it may, in its consequences, affect the exercise of the power of the legislature to declare war. Nevertheless, the executive cannot thereby control the exercise of that power. The legislature is still free to perform its duties, according to its own sense of them; though the executive, in the exercise of its constitutional powers, may establish an antecedent state of things, which ought to weigh in the legislative decision. The division of the executive power in the Constitution, creates a concurrent authority in the cases to which it relates.

3 0
3 years ago
S.O.S I'm doing E.L.A
Naddika [18.5K]

1. I watched the balloon rise in the air.

2. I will raise my balloon up too.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which sentence is punctuated correctly?
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

That would be C.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a possible theme of “everyday use”
Liono4ka [1.6K]
Heritage, ownership
Explain…
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which would be an action word?<br><br> A. ran<br><br> B. hair
    13·2 answers
  • What was Henry David Thoreau's purpose is writing "Resistance to Civil Government"?
    8·2 answers
  • HELPPPP
    11·1 answer
  • HELLP!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE<br><br> what was the main idea of chapter 2?
    10·1 answer
  • ESSAY 1:Lady Macbeth, described as a fiend-like queen, is responsible for the deaths ofcountless people. She meets a fitting end
    15·1 answer
  • Help me finish these sentences. 1. Our health-care provider 2. She was offered a part-time position
    7·2 answers
  • What gesture was Shakespeare trying to capture with the bolded section of text below?
    8·1 answer
  • The day after the event, Samuel wrote about seeing a firefighter save a kitten from a burning house. What type of autobiographic
    9·1 answer
  • How can we prepare for Jesus coming on advent day?
    11·1 answer
  • Which words from the story support the answer in Part A?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!