What is a “strict constructionist” view of the Constitution?

History

1 answer:

Mumz [18]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Strict constructionism is a legal theory applied in American law by means of which a restricted interpretation of the Constitution of the United States and the clauses, rights and prerogatives that it establishes in its articles is defended.

Thus, this position adopts a conservative interpretation of the constitutional text that, although it does not become textual, does restrict the possibility that the judges make analogies or another type of interpretation of an expansive nature on the precepts established in the Constitution.

You might be interested in

It is one of the main reasons Hoover lost the election of 1932.

azamat

The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the first choice or letter A. Hoover lost the elections because Americans felt Hoover’s reforms had not done enough to help them directly.

Roosevelt defeated Hoover in the 1932 Presidential election because he offered the people of America a way out of being poor and homeless. He offered them hope of a brighter future. He offered them a chance to once again have decent jobs to pay off debts, to buy houses and food. He had already proved himself capable by setting up the first state-run relief agency. 

I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which cultural element remained after the fall of the Han Dynasty?

gtnhenbr [62]

Elaborate sculptures
hope this helps

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What were the three natural rights John Locke believed in the natural rights of man

katrin2010 [14]

Answers:

The three natural rights that John Locke believed in was the natural rights to live Life, to have Liberty, and to Property. He believed that for everyone, even though in those times there was color discrimination!

Hope this Helps!

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Draw Conclusions How might party membership have affected the justices?

Lilit [14]

Answer:

The decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court are seldom without controversy, and ... Scholars are now trying to make sense of the Court's 2013 decisions — on gay

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

What is the difference between a scientific argument and a regular argument?

pishuonlain [190]

A scientific argument is when it had more examples of that certain argument. What I’m saying is that scientific arguments have more details and more evidence to why that answer is wrong or right. Regular arguments is when it is less detailed and just making predictions and theoretical analysis. (Hope this helps)

3 0

3 years ago