Answer:
<h2>Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
</h2>
Explanation:
Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, (Feb. 2, 1848), treaty between the United States and Mexico that ended the Mexican War. It was signed at Villa de Guadalupe Hidalgo, which is a northern neighborhood of Mexico City.
<h2>hope it helps please mark me as brlilliant!</h2>
Answer:
a. The spread of the AIDS virus
Explanation:
i took the test
The western front during World War I was located in <u>France, Belgium, and Germany.</u> It was the main area where the fighting of the great conflict and deadliest battles took place. This war ended in November 1918.
<h3>Further explanation</h3>
It was the German army that invaded this part of Europe from 1914. On June 28, they entered Luxembourg. Subsequently, they also managed to control Belgium and large areas of eastern France. The war lasted 4 years and the different armies stuck because trenches were dug in each camp and no one could move forward. The countries that clash was Germany on one side, France and the British Empire on the other. It was not until 1918 that the allies finally managed to progress in the German camp, which led to the end of the war with the signing of the armistice on November 11, 1918.
There were also other fronts in most parts of the world. For example, the eastern and central Europe, Italy, the Middle East, and Africa, but they were not comparable to the western front that was the deadliest of the first world war.
<h3>Learn more</h3>
- European alliances before World War I: brainly.com/question/921155
- The beginning of World War II: brainly.com/question/1150550
- The Blitzkrieg: brainly.com/question/10537685
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Subject: History
Chapter: World War I
Keywords: the battles of World War I, different fronts of the first World War, german strategy in World War I
This was the missing excerpt:
<span>Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with, or even before, the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible, and pray to the same God; and each invokes his aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men’s faces; but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered—that of neither has been answered fully.
</span>
This was the missing choices:
A) logical fallacy
B) extended metaphor
C) parallel structure
<span>D) rhetorical question
</span>
The rhetorical device Lincoln used to emphasize that everyone has a stake in the war is C. PARALLEL STRUCTURE.
He compared the expectations and desires of both parties using the parallel structure to show that the concerns were of the same level of importance.
1- justice is plainly giving back what is deserved
2- justice is the interest of "strong, governing parties"
3- "it is a social necessity for the weak, but not valuable once one becomes strong"
the book, the republic by plato may help you find where he claims this stuff
ps where there is quotes you should rewrite in your own words
