The essay on the Why are there laws limiting the freedom of speech is written below.
<h3> Why are there laws limiting the freedom of speech?</h3>
The freedom of a person to express oneself is very important to man's ability to pass out their opinions, convictions, and also their beliefs, and to be able to be involved in democracy.
The Supreme Court was known to have stated some measures of restrictions on speech as a result or based on its content.
This is one that is seen in the area of if the government targets the speaker's message and thus violate the First Amendment.
Gehan, 2021, stated that the common justificatory approaches that is often used in a set of jurisdictions to frame the state’s burden was the need or the justification of the limitations on the freedom of expression via the use of the proportionality test.
Citation:
Gunatilleke, Gehan. (2021). Justifying Limitations on the Freedom of Expression. Human Rights Review. 22. 1-18. 10.1007/s12142-020-00608-8.
Learn more about freedom of speech from
brainly.com/question/243946
#SPJ1
Answer: Burr
Explanation: Later, when Burr begins his correspondence with Hamilton leading up to their duel, she hands him the quill. Finally, in the duel itself, she is the bullet that kills Hamilton.
Cool! Good to know. Well, have a wonderful day!
I do believe that, after research, it is C, Coltan.
Correct me if I am wrong, but do have a good day!
Scarcity is the fundamental challenge that all individuals and nations must confront. Everyone faces some limitations, so we all have to make choices where we limit or allow ourselves to something.
Economists generally recognize four types of economic systems traditional, traditional, command, market and mixed.
A traditional economic system is shaped by tradition. The work that people do, the goods and services they provide, how they exchange resources… all tend to follow a pattern. The traditional system is bad at addressing scarcity because scarcity is formed off of new requirements people have through the ages and a traditional system would not evolve just as our requirements would.
In a planned economy, the government controls the economy. The state decides how to use and distribute resources. The government regulates prices and wages; it may even determine what sorts of work individuals do.
Socialism is a prime example of a planned economy. Socialism does not work because it is not consistent with the fundamental principles of human behavior. The failure of socialism in countries around the world can be traced to one critical defect: it is a system that ignores incentives.
Market economies allow all economic decisions to be made by individuals. The unrestrained interactions between individuals and companies in the marketplace determine what happens to all the good and resources.Individuals choose how to invest their personal resources and individuals decide what to consume. Within a pure market economy, the government is entirely absent from economic affairs.
A mixed economic system combines elements of the market and command economy. Many economic decisions are made in the market by individuals. But the government also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources.
If scarcity is looked at on a macro level, the best economic system is mixed because it allows the government to also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources, while the individuals still stay happy because they have some control. The only problem is the eternal question of what the right mix between the public and private sectors of the economy should be.
There is no point to look at it on a micro level because almost no country is small enough to be considered on that level.
