All categories

3 years ago

Can Columbus be held responsible for the devastation the indigenous people went through from the spainiards

Social Studies

1 answer:

Dimas [21]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

Columbus and the Destruction of Native peoples. The first and most important thing to understand is that the Native American population on Hispaniola (and later, Cuba) was destroyed over the course of a century or less, and that the Spanish were primarily responsible for this. Certainly Columbus was not a perfect person by any means, and was a man of many flaws.

You might be interested in

The growth of factories is to the Industrial Revolution, as the growth of cities is to

yanalaym [24]

Answer:

1. Urbanization

2. phones

3. First continential congress?

(Three is probably wrong, be warned.)

4 0

2 years ago

In addition to being appointed by the president, cabinet members must also

White raven [17]

I believe the answer is A, but also C sounds familiar, I hope it is one of these! If not, I truly apologize.

7 0

3 years ago

It was late on a Friday afternoon when Makari Polzin got a call at the help desk for Taggart Transcontinental. A man with an edg

QveST [7]

Answer:

Identity theft

Explanation:

Identity theft is a serious crime in which an individual(scammer) assumes fake identity of a person in order to gain personal information of the person.

The personal information which may include date of birth, social security numbers or password gotten is then used for their personal gains which may include stealing money or other vital information and documents.

6 0

3 years ago

What is the only u. S. City to have hosted the winter olympics twice?.

ValentinkaMS [17]

Answer:

Lake Placid

Explanation:

Lake Placid hosted the Winters Olympics in 1932 & 1980 respectively.

Learn more about the Olympics, here:

brainly.com/question/11781126?referrer=searchResults - historical information regarding the Olympics.

7 0

1 year ago

Which of the following statements is an argument in favor of trusts?

Aleonysh [2.5K]

The following statement is the argument in favor of trusts: 4) Trusts used their money to influence politicians who passed laws that were favorable to big business.

Explanation:

Business men usually influence the politicians by offering them money to get their work done.

Politicians are members of the parliament and government. They are responsible in making and passing laws. Business men urge them to pass laws that are favorable for their big business. This in turn brings them lot of profit. Trusts was initially formed to serve the people in need.

5 0

3 years ago