Answer:
E
Explanation:
In this question, we are told to state what the reaction of Koka and Zola will be;
Kukla and Zola both like the proposal. As according to the given opportunity cost for Kukla (3 rugs per every 4 tables) she can get 1.5 rugs for 2 tables .But with the offer made now she can get 2 rugs for giving 2 tables.
Given the opportunity cost for Zola ( 2 tables per every 3 rugs ) she must give 3 rugs for getting 2 tables. But with the offer made she can now get 2 tables for giving away only 2 rugs .
So both Kukla and Zola are happy with the offer.
<span>The opportunity cost of reading is watching TV.
</span>
Opportunity cost alludes to an advantage that a person could have gotten, yet offered up, to make another course of move. Expressed in an unexpected way, an opportunity cost that shows an alternative given up when a choice is made. This cost is, accordingly, most significant for two totally unrelated occasions.
Answer:
1. Per se application - US Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of US competition law
2. Misuse of activity - EU Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of EU competition law
3. Extraterritoriality - US and EU
Justification: It is a provision of US and EU antitrust and competition law
4. Trade obstacle, non-tariff - France
Justification: These are considered to be part of the France trade system
5. Strict liability - U.S. Tort Law
Justification: It is part of the U.S. Tort Law and depends on intent to harm liability
6. Punitive damages - U.S. Product Liability Law
Justification: It is a provision of U.S. Product Liability Law
