All categories

2 years ago

The total assets and total liabilities (in millions) of ABC Corporation and XYZ Corporation follow:

Business

2 answers:

nadezda [96]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

ABC Corporation stockholders' equity = $21,896 (in millions)

XYZ Corporation stockholders' equity = $19,722 (in millions)

Explanation:

The accounting equation shows the relationship between the elements of a balance sheet namely; the assets, liabilities and stockholders' equity . This is given as

Assets = Liabilities + stockholders' equity

Hence for ABC Corporation, given in millions;

Assets = $39,100

Liabilities = $17,204

ABC Corporation stockholders' equity = $39,100 - $17,204

= $21,896

For XYZ Corporation, given in millions;

Assets = $37,927

Liabilities = $18,205

XYZ Corporation stockholders' equity = $37,927 - $18,205

= $19,722

lbvjy [14]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

For ABC CORPORATION, stockholders' equity is $21,896,000,000

For XYZ CORPORATION, stockholders' equity is $19,722,000,000

Explanation:

Stockholders' Equity is the owner's residual interest in the business.

The formula for equity equals Asset minus liability

For ABC CORPORATION =

Asset = $39,100,000,000

Liability = $17,204,000,000

Stockholders' Equity = Asset - Liability

= $39,100,000,000 - $17,204,000,000 = $21,896,000,000

For XYZ CORPORATION =

Asset = $37,927000,000

Liability = $18,205000,000

Stockholders' Equity = Asset - Liability

= $37,927,000,000 - $18,205000,000 = $19,722,000,000

You might be interested in

For each scenario, calculate the cross-price elasticity between the two goods and identify how the goods are related. Please use

Leto [7]

Answer:

a. Cross-price elasticity between A and B: 0. Relationship between A and B: No relationship.

b. Cross-price elasticity between C and D: 2.22. Relationship between C and D: Substitute.

c. Cross-price elasticity between E and F: -8.50. relationship between E and F: Complimentary.

Explanation:

a. Cross-price elasticity between A and B: relationship between A and B:

Percentage change in price of A = 20%

Percentage change in quantity of B = 0%

Cross-price elasticity between A and B = 0%/ 20% = 0.00

Relationship between A and B = No relationship

Note: There is no relationship between A and B because the cross-price elasticity between A and B is zero. That is, change in the price of A does not have any effect on the quantity demanded of B.

b. Cross-price elasticity between C and D: relationship between C and D:

Percentage change in price of C = {($4 - $3) / [($4 + $3) / 2]} * 100 = 28.5714285714286%

Percentage change in quantity of D = {(85 - 44) / [(85 + 44) / 2]} * 100 = 63.5658914728682%

Cross-price elasticity between C and D = 63.5658914728682% / 28.5714285714286% = 2.22

Relationship between C and D = Substitute

Note: The relationship between C and D is substitute because the cross-price elasticity between C and D is positive. That is, an increase in the price of C makes consumer to switch to and buy more of D which is a substitute.

c. cross-price elasticity between E and F: relationship between E and F:

Percentage change in price of E = - 2%

Percentage change in quantity of F = 17%

Cross-price elasticity between E and F = 17%/ (-2%) = - 8.50

Relationship between E and F = Complimentary.

Note: The relationship between E and F is complimentary because the cross-price elasticity between E and F is negative. That is, an increase in the price of E makes consumer to buy more less F which is a compliment or use together with E.

7 0

2 years ago

How can Jude, a high-end automobile dealer, decide whether to grant one of his potential customers credit?

morpeh [17]

Answer:

B.check with a credit and information management company

5 0

2 years ago

A revenue tariff is designed to assist more efficient domestic producers, whereas a protective tariff is designed to promote imp

bezimeni [28]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Revenue tariff means increasing earnings. It will raise government revenue instead of protecting domestic ventures. It is a direct income in the form of tax to obtain from corporate revenues.

On the other hand, protective tariffs are designed to protect domestic producers. It protects local manufacturers by imposing a heavy duty on imported products, which enables the products to become less attractive. Therefore, the aim is to reduce imports.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What do the income effect, the substitution effect, and diminishing marginal utility have in common?

Sveta_85 [38]

Answer:

They all help explain the downsloping demand curve

Explanation:

The options to the question wasn't provided. The complete question can be in the attached image.

The demand curve slopes downward from left to right. This indicates that the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded and the lower the price, the higher the quantity demanded.

Income effect is a change in quantity demanded when real income change. Quantity demanded increases when real income increases and decreases when real income falls.

Substitution effect says that consumers would substituite to the consumption of a cheaper good when the price of a good originally consumed increases.

Diminishing marginal utility states that as consumption increases, utility derived from consumption falls and quantity demanded falls.

I hope my answer helps you

3 0

2 years ago

The short-run average total cost (ATC) curve of a firm will tend to be U-shaped because Group of answer choices larger firms alw

DaniilM [7]

Answer:

at low levels of output, AFC will be high, while at high levels of output, MC will be high as the result of diminishing returns.

Explanation:

In Economics, the law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the unit of a good or service consumed by an individual increases, the additional satisfaction he or she derives from consuming additional units would start decreasing or diminishing as the units of good or service consumed increases.

The short-run average total cost (ATC) curve of a firm will tend to be U-shaped because at low levels of output, average fixed cost (AFC) will be high, while at high levels of output, marginal cost (MC) will be high as the result of diminishing returns.

This ultimately implies that, the average fixed cost (AFC) will be high at small (low-level) output rates while marginal cost (MC) will be high at large (high-level) output rates due to diminishing marginal returns.

As a result of the law of diminishing marginal returns, a business firm would experience some rising per unit costs in the short-run.

In conclusion, an increase in the level of output for a business firm will eventually lead to an increase in average total cost (ATC) and marginal cost (MC) due to the law of diminishing marginal returns.

8 0

2 years ago