He uses quatrains. The rhyme scheme of the quatrains is abab cdcd efef.
The structure of his sonnet is that there are fourteen lines and the first twelve lines are divided into three quatrains with four lines each. In each quatrains, the poet develops a problem and resolves it in the final two lines which is called "couplet".
This poem expresses the poet's identification of his consciousness with all objects and forms, and the list of things which he himself identifies with is large and comprehensive and is a good example of Whitman's catalogs. The continual process of becoming is at the heart of the poem. We become something or grow into something and this is the process of becoming, of change and development. The interpenetration of the child's consciousness and physical phenomena, as shown in this poem, is one of the essential elements of Whitman's thought.
<h2>Option 4 & 5 are the right answers</h2>
Explanation:
Let us understand the term "Expository writing".
- It is all about opinion. But opinion will be connected to a facts
- It is free from prejudice
- Present argument for the said opinion
It consists of 3 parts:
Introduction: This talk about the central idea of the topic
Main body: Here where the opinions begins and a proof for the said opinion will also be given
Conclusion: A re-insisting of the idea along with quoting facts
A fact is that every composition or essay that you write on your own in schools and colleges are "Expository" in nature provided you add proper facts to match your statement.
Answer:
In Guy de Maupassant’s The Necklace the author utilizes a third person narrator who possesses a limited omniscience (1010). This narrator is exposed through the fact that there is never an “I” in the story. It seems as though the story is being told in retrospect, by on who has some connection to each and every character in the story. This is evidenced in the very beginning of the book where Maupassant writes, “She dressed plainly because she could not dress well, but she was as unhappy as though she had really fallen from her proper station…” (524). The narrator is obviously in tune with the feelings o Mme. Loisel, beyond that of a bystander, which would suggest an omniscience to some extent. However, the narrator seems unable at times to examine the thoughts or feelings of a specific character. When Mme. Forestier meets Mme. Loisel after years of hard work have faded Mme. Loisel’s beauty, there is no discussion of her surprise or inner thoughts, merely the words that were spoken (529). Therefore, there is but limited omniscience, which is used chiefly (although not always) on Mme. Loisel. This selection of which character’s mind to pry into is sound, as Mme. Loisel is the main character whom the story revolves around.
In choosing a third person, limited omniscience narrator, Maupassant grants the reader a deeper insight into the characters than a narrator who is only concerned with the facts. “She had no dresses, no jewels, nothing. And she loved nothing but that; she felt made for that” (524). This knowledge essentially sets the stage for things to come, without it we would lack understanding of what in Mme. Loisel’s character drives her life.
Even though insight into a character’s mind is enlightening, without leaving parts of a character to he imagination, the reader may not feel as though they have been given a fair chance to imagine the character. Maupassant does a good job in informing us of necessary information while still giving free reign to the imagination.
Explanation:
Answer: Byron rejected the style of Coleridge and Wordsworth and broke all social conventions.
This is the statement that best reflects the relationship between these three authors. Byron disliked their style, and he believed them to be too superficial and conventional. He thought that the topics these authors talked about were not challenging or complex. Moreover, he believed their use of language to not be innovative enough. Byron wanted to adopt a style that could set him apart from these authors.