Answer:
Parliament responded to the protests against the Tea Act by passing the Intolerable Acts.
Explanation:
The Intolerable Acts was the name given to the laws issued in 1774 by the British Parliament due to continued discontent in the Thirteen Colonies, particularly in Boston after turbulent incidents such as the Tea Party. These acts accelerated the processes that culminated in the War of Independence of the United States and the formation of the First Continental Congress.
The acts had different consequences. The Massachusetts Government Act undid representative government and also decreed that political posts in colonial government were elected by Great Britain. The Administration of Justice Act authorized the Governor of Massachusetts the right to transfer any judgment to Great Britain and authorized coercive actions to give witnesses to the case. The Boston Port Act closed the Port of Boston until it was paid for damages for the Tea Party in Boston, though it was never done. The Quartering Act declared that the British troops not only had to lodge in commercial and empty buildings, but also in private houses.
The Intolerable Acts were also a determining factor for the convening of the First Continental Congress and the Declaration of Rights and Grievances. The Continental Congress rejected the Intolerable Acts when creating the Continental Association. The aim was to boycott British goods and if that failed to force Parliament to remove the tax records, then it would stop exporting to Britain.
The United Kingdom does not have a codified constitution. However, a number of texts are considered to be constitutional, such that the "constitution of the United Kingdom" or "British constitution" may refer to a number of historical and momentous laws and principles that make up the country's body politic. Hope this help:)
The correct answer is A) disparate impact.
An employment-related decision that has a discriminatory effect on a particular group may be legally defensible if it is based on disparate impact.
That is why there is legislation in the United States that protects workers and employers. That is why employers of a protected minority in the workplace are affected by the decisions of the managers or owners. For example, if a group of African Americans or Hispano people are not hired by their color of skin, race, or nationality. The same case if the minority protected group has a different sexual orientation. The EEOC or Equal Employment Opportunity Commission exists to protect the labor rights of minority groups in the United States, so everybody could have a fair chance to thrive in the workplace.
