Well psalms were written by Solomon to glorify god not a king so its not B, the answer is A
Answer:
Explanation:
Esperanza is jealous of Alicia because she has a town to call home, Guadalajara, and she will return there someday. Alicia observes that Esperanza already has a home. But Esperanza shakes her head. She does not want to have lived in the house for a year, or to come from Mango Street. She declares that she will never come back to Mango Street until someone makes it better. Then Alicia asks who will make it better, suggesting the mayor as a possibility. The girls laugh because the idea of the mayor coming to Mango Street is so far outside the realm of possibility.
Answer:
Yesterday, my friend and me went to a restaurant to have dinner . It was the worst restaurant experience in ours entire life. The service , the waiter had to bring me a vegetarian pasta but he brought me a margarita. The restaurant is in Oman but on leaving we couldn't find home, we fond a real expensive man gold watch and he insisted that we should go to the police station to hand it at the station, criminals and less police officers'. I have no idea what we were there for, we just left it their and minded our own business. I remembered that I forgot my key with my friend.
Explanation:
This paragraph is an example of a Toulmin argument.
The Toulmin method has six elements: claim, grounds, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal. The elements are used in this paragraph are;
<u>Claim</u>: a statement that the author wants the audience to accept as true.
<em>"I believe the cost of drilling is too high."</em>
<u>Grounds</u>: information that the claim is based off of.
<em>"I agree with environmentalists who fear that drilling will disturb the migration of more than 130,000 caribou."</em>
<u>Backing</u>: additional support for the claim by addressing different points related to your claim.
"In addition, experts say that the oil in the area adds up to less than a six-month supply."
<u>Rebuttal</u>: addresses the opposing view to reinforce the original argument.
<em>"Is such a small amount of oil worth the risk drilling poses to the animals?"</em>
