Question

Which perspective would most likely argue that democracies do not go to war with one another because leaders have to appeal to larger coalitions to survive politically and, therefore, choose wars only with nondemocratic countries in which democracies enjoy an advantage in mobilizing military resources

Answer 1

Answer:

The critical theory perspective

Explanation:

Sociology can be defined as a social science that deals with the study of the socio-cultural interaction of humans with respect to the structure, functioning and development of their society.

The main purpose of sociology is to develop and enhance human knowledge or understanding of important socio-cultural processes through the gathering and analysis of all aspects of the social life of the people living in a society.

The critical theory perspective is a type of political and social philosophy that is mainly focused on the critique and reflective assessment of the society, culture, and other systems that affect human lives.

Thus, it's a perspective which would most likely argue that democracies do not go to war with one another because leaders have to appeal or be in the good books of the people (larger coalitions) so as to survive politically. Thus, leaders in democracies would only choose wars with non-democratic countries in which military resources are mobilized in times of dispute.

Democracy can be defined as a government of the people, by the people and for the people.

There are two (2) main types of democracy and these include;

I. Representative democracy.

II. Direct democracy.