Answer:
Explanation:
En política, se denomina conservadurismo al conjunto de doctrinas, corrientes, opiniones y posiciones, generalmente de centroderecha y derecha, que favorecen las tradiciones1 y que son adversas a los cambios políticos, sociales o económicos radicales, oponiéndose al progresismo. En lo social, los conservadores defienden valores familiares y religiosos.
El conservadurismo es un modelo mental que es enseñado de manera individual o colectiva, con base en las enseñanzas o experiencias adquiridas en las diferentes etapas de la vida de los seres humanos y con el objetivo de moldear los hábitos de las personas conforme a las creencias del conservadurismo de determinada sociedad del mundo.2
En lo económico, los conservadores históricamente se posicionaron como proteccionistas, en oposición al libre mercado. Sin embargo, durante el siglo XX algunos de los partidos conservadores adoptaron posiciones económicas liberales al fusionarse con partidos de esta tendencia, aliados en la defensa del sistema socioeconómico capitalista, en oposición al socialismo y el comunismo. Consecuentemente, en la actualidad dentro del conservadurismo político coexisten diversas posturas sobre lo económico. A la fusión entre ambas posturas se la denomina comúnmente como liberalismo conservador.
Así, dentro de la misma corriente algunos buscan mantener las condiciones presentes o un progreso paulatino dentro de un orden social heredado, otros buscan volver a situaciones anteriores, por lo que existe una cierta confusión —incluso dentro de la misma cultura política— acerca de quiénes serían, en un momento dado, conservadores. Martín Blinkhorn, por ejemplo, pregunta: "¿Quiénes son los conservadores en la Rusia de estos días? ¿Son los estalinistas irredentos o los reformadores que han aceptado las visiones políticas de derecha de los conservadores modernos, tal como Margaret Thatcher?".
<span>Actually here in this scenario the only advantage of divorce is that person can again become independent in life and from all other unwanted relations, there by even look for a new person or new independent life in future, where as disadvantages are many mainly that person looks very negative infront of other people or socially, then that person will be psychologically weak and yes living together is very different from marriage as there is no big responsibilities like in marriage life.</span>
The Persian empire had different lands under its command at different times, but at the time when it was the biggest, it had lands corresponding to todays: (550 BC)
Iran
Turkey
Egypt
Iraq
Kuwait
Syria,
Jordan
Israel
Palestine
Lebanon
and parts of Libya, Bulgaria and Greece
Explanation:
An increase in the number of social grants to teenage mothers is likely to have negative consequences as listed:
i) Grants make people lazy and dependent on the government
The teen mothers will not be motivated to become self-reliant by looking for work. Instead they rely on the government grants to acquire capital which they use for their needs.
ii) The child grant increases teenage pregnancy.
This is where teen mothers may become pregnant intentionally to access the grants.
iii) Recipients misuse grant money.
The teen mothers may use the grants to buy drugs and abusing of alcohol. The monies are primarily used for food and some basic non-food items such as school fees and uniforms, health and transport.
iv) Social Life
When the number of social grants to teen mothers are increased, their social lives are impacted negatively. These teen mothers see themselves as pariahs and burdens to the society. They are likely to withdraw from social life due to the shame and low self-esteem they often experience.
v) Financial Life
Due to the fact that these teen mothers often do not have stable jobs, their financial lives are uncertain. They depend on the social grants for their upkeep. If these grants are increased many teen mothers do not perceive the value of looking for employment.
vi) Education
Since most of the teen mothers drop out of school after they become pregnant, their education ceases. Increasing the number of social grants discourages them from completing their studies. They reason that since they are getting 'free money' there is no need for further education.
