Answer:
of Educ., 526 U.S. 629 (1999). To be actionable, the school must either have caused the harassment or made students vulnerable to it. ... Finally, a school remains deliberately indifferent to the harassment where its response was clearly unreasonable in light of the known circumstances.
Explanation:
Learned bout it in school because a student was mad and wanted to press charges about something and this was brought up
Answer:
The Red Lantern is a symbol of perseverance and determination.
Explanation:
The Red Lantern is given to the last musher who crosses the finish line and completes the Iditarod. The Iditarod Trail Committee lights a widows lamp in Nome on the first Sunday of March, the day of the restart. They hang it on the Burled Arch and it stays lit until the final musher crosses the finish line. It is then extinguished. This practice came from the days of the Gold Rush when dog sled teams were used to move freight and mail. Each roadhouse along the trail would light a kerosene lamp and hang it outside the roadhouse to help the mushers find their way in the snow and darkness. It was also a signal that there was a dog team out on the trail. The lamp was extinguished when the dog team safely reached its destination.
Answer:
B. The National Response Framework explains how, at all levels, the nation effectively manages all-hazards response.
Explanation:
The national response framework mentioned that in most cases, hazard responses managed by the locals tend to be the most effective.
Emergency situations tend to require a fast and proper response in order to minimize the damage. If a local community only rely on National-coordinated response, there is a chance the help can come too late since it took time for national response to send the necessary personnel and resources to the emergency location.
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
