Answer:
The answer is construct validity.
Explanation:
Construct validity is described as the degree in which a study<em> actually</em> measures what it claims to be measuring. A well-designed research will ideally have high construct validy, while a poorly designed one may confound the variables and result in measuring a different aspect.
For example, if a researcher tries to find which of two perfumes is more attractive to customers, <u>but uses different shaped or coloured bottles</u>, it's possible that the test will lack construct validity (the bottles may affect the customers' opinions).
The first to settle there were the English from England.
That would be a <span>Reference Group, good luck!</span>
Answer:
The options are
A. during the game, a person in a gorilla suit walked into and out of the scene; almost everyone failed to notice
B. during the game, a person in a gorilla suit walked into and out of the scene, nearly half failed to notice
C. a person in a gorilla suit was one of the ball passers, almost no one failed to notice
D. a person in a gorilla suit was one of the ball passers, nearly half failed to notice
The answer is - A. during the game, gorilla suit walked in and out, almost everyone failed to notice.
The experiment by Simon and Chabris in 1999 involved participants watching people passing a basketball around in order to keep track of some activity within the game. The distinctive feature of the scene in which a proportion of people failed to notice was during the game, gorilla suit walked in and out, almost everyone failed to notice.
