<h2>
Answer explanation:</h2>
If a coin is fair then it has two faces , one is heads and the another is tails.
The probability getting any favorable outcomes is given by the formula :-
So the factor effecting probability is just the number of favorable outcomes and total outcomes.
If a coin is tossed then the probability of getting heads will be :-
To get heads always this should be 1 , which can be happen if number of favorable outcomes is equal to total outcomes.
i.e. Number of heads = Number of total outcomes, this means coin should be biased.
Catching the coin in mid-air can never be a factor for this.
Therefore, the little brother's theory is false.
Answer: im pretty sure you times the inside of the area of the triangle and it should work
Step-by-step explanation:
<span>Let's summarize the facts:
the tape is 75 feet long
the bedroom is 12 feet by 14 feet.
1. Tell how you can critique Jason’s reasoning.
If you want to Critique Jason's reasoning, you could a) ask yourself the same questions that Jason did and see if you would come with the same answers and used the same analysis or b) analyse Jason's answer to see if he did a mistake or missed an important detail and made a thought mistake
2. Critique Jason’s reasoning
I will use the option b from above:
?
</span><span>Jason first multiplied 12 x 14 = 168. This multiplication is correct, but what did he get? He needed to get the perimeter of the bedroom because it was only the wallpaper border, not the wallpaper itself - so getting the perimeter was needed, but this we get by the formula ( 2* *(length+width), not length* width - as Jason did.
So Jason made a mistake here! his actual answer should be 2*(12+14)=2*26=52, so the tape of 75 feet would have been enough!</span><span>
3. Jason uses an overestimate to decide how many rolls of wallpaper he needs for another’s room. Explain why his reasoning to use an overestimate does or does not make sense
Using an overestimate is often a good idea- in case some of the tape gets damaged, he will have some left. However, since his calculations are wrong by a lot (he multiplies rather than adds and multiplies by 2), his overestimate will be a lot higher than would be practical - he would be left with a lot of leftovers and spend too much money. So his reasoning does not make sense</span>
If you look closely you'll see that x can take on any real value here. On the other hand, y can equal -4 (maximum) or any real number smaller than -4.
Translate this information into interval notation.
Answer:
-½
Step-by-step explanation:
Slope is (y2-y1)÷(x2-x1). Use these two coordinates. Substitute.
(5-7)÷(1-(-3))=(-2)÷4= -(1/2)
