1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leto [7]
3 years ago
8

under Chief justice john marshall, surpreme Court descisions generally upheld alexander hamilton's belief that

Law
1 answer:
Monica [59]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D. a loose interpretation of the Constitution could be used to increase federal power.

Explanation:

John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1801 till his death in 1835. Without any prior study in law, he studied law in only just six weeks.

Under Supreme Court's decision under Chief Justice John Marshall upheld Alexander Hamilton's interpretation of the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton advocated broad and liberal interpretation of the Constitution. This belief was upheld by the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall. The Supreme Court uphelded a loose and liberal interpretation of the Constitution could be used to increase federal power.

Therefore, option D is correct.

You might be interested in
Common Law
Anika [276]
The answer to your question is (D)
8 0
3 years ago
The Legislative Branch of the United States is NOT entrusted with which of the powers listed below?
dybincka [34]

It should be: Command of the Armed Forces is the right answer

7 0
2 years ago
Hahahahaha
earnstyle [38]

Answer:

I got u bro bro

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Please help, will mark brainlest
shutvik [7]

Answer:

A) Check traffic coming from behind before opening your door.

Explanation:

You should always Check traffic coming from behind before opening your door because, you might get hurt and the other driver might also get hurt because of that.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Your uncle Brian stole three t-shirts from a stand at the mall. You are upset that he made this choice, and decide to use your i
uysha [10]

Answer: I think that the rule is very wrong and it is very foolish.

I think that if someone is breaking the law, we should be able to provide all the evidence we need to put this thief behind bars.

If nobody recorded, how else would the evidence get to the police?

If nobody recorded, the thief can say that he did not steal anything.

The Police and the Supreme Court need to have evidence that way there is no confusion and that way there is not anymore trouble.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which part or parts of the 14th Amendment would force states to protect the rights in the Federal U.S. constitution?
    12·1 answer
  • Please help me with this Forensic Science question, ASAP.
    9·1 answer
  • How are judicial activism and judicial review related?
    10·2 answers
  • Please explain how the Declaration of Independence was a world altering
    12·1 answer
  • While driving your vehicle, if you see this traffic sign it means...<br><br> Plz help fast
    7·2 answers
  • 4.<br> What is a substrate control? Why is it done?
    14·1 answer
  • Hi i need to know wich of the following is a use of the fungi kingdom
    6·1 answer
  • The worst answer to “being informed” and responding to an Active Shooter / Threat, is? Choose the best answer from the list of a
    10·1 answer
  • Why is fingerprint analysis not accurate in crime?
    15·2 answers
  • ***50 POINTS+BRAINLIEST*** Number 8 <br> Question in picture below.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!