The amount he had to pay if he have to purchase a laptop today that is the same value as the one he saw in the ad is $ 390.24.
Given that:-
Price of the laptop after 1 year = $ 400.
Inflation rate = 2.5 %
We have to find the amount he had to pay if he have to purchase a laptop today that is the same value as the one he saw in the ad.
Let the price he had to pay be x.
Hence, we can write,
x + (x*(2.5)*1)/100 = 400
x(1 + 1/40) = 400
x(41/40) = 400
x = 400*40/41 = $ 16000/41 = $ 390.24.
To learn more about amount, here:-
brainly.com/question/8082054
#SPJ1
Answer:
Following are the response to the given points:
Step-by-step explanation:
For question 5.11:
For point a:
For all the particular circumstances, it was not an appropriate sampling strategy as each normal distribution acquired is at a minimum of 30(5) = 150 or 2.5 hours for a time. Its point is not absolutely fair if it exhibits any spike change for roughly 10 minutes.
For point b:
The problem would be that the process can transition to an in the state in less than half an hour and return to in the state. Thus, each subgroup is a biased selection of the whole element created over the last
hours. Another sampling approach is a group.
For question 5.12:
This production method creates 500 pieces each day. A sampling section is selected every half an hour, and the average of five dimensions can be seen in a
line graph when 5 parts were achieved.
This is not an appropriate sampling method if the assigned reason leads to a sluggish, prolonged uplift. The difficulty would be that gradual or longer upward drift in the procedure takes or less half an hour then returns to a controlled state. Suppose that a shift of both the detectable size will last hours
. An alternative type of analysis should be a random sample of five consecutive pieces created every
hour.
It would be A since in the equation (x+4)^2-2 the plus 4 means horizontal shift to the left and -2 means vertical shift down 2
Answer:
jesus is always the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
jesus jesus