Answer:
The answer is one.
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm not exactly sure if I'm right , so sorry, if it's wrong
Y=31.2
X=15.6
I rounded both to the nearest tenth place.
Answer:
Since the calculated value of z= -1.496 does not fall in the critical region z < -1.645 we conclude that the new program is effective. We fail to reject the null hypothesis .
Step-by-step explanation:
The sample proportion is p2= 7/27= 0.259
and q2= 0.74
The sample size = n= 27
The population proportion = p1= 0.4
q1= 0.6
We formulate the null and alternate hypotheses that the new program is effective
H0: p2> p1 vs Ha: p2 ≤ p1
The test statistic is
z= p2- p1/√ p1q1/n
z= 0.259-0.4/ √0.4*0.6/27
z= -0.141/0.09428
z= -1.496
The significance level ∝ is 0.05
The critical region for one tailed test is z ≤ ± 1.645
Since the calculated value of z= -1.496 does not fall in the critical region z < -1.645 we conclude that the new program is effective. We fail to reject the null hypothesis .
Answer:
125%
Step-by-step explanation:
so you are increasing by $10, and $10 is 25% of $40, so the percent change is 125%
Answer:
i think 30° gonna stay the same
Step-by-step explanation:
