Undoubtedly, there needs to be a certain degree of arms proliferation in all countries in order to secure their borders from external or internal threats. However, when the military budget of countries like the USA, the world´s largest power, is far greater than the budget destined to meet other needs of the State, these latter ones are unavoidably neglected, to the detriment of the country´s people. On the other hand, if a greater budget is destined to the building of infrastructure, history shows —like in Japan and Germany— that the economy becomes less dependent on warfare and relies more on human capital and culture.
The question then becomes whether economic gain through arms proliferation is more advantageous to the welfare of the people or if the wellbeing of the people —through the building of infrastructure— is more beneficial to any given government. Since the wellbeing of the people is, in principle —based on the International Bill of Human Rights—, the aim of all countries, these should be more preoccupied with the building of infrastructure.
Answer:
In American history, the Fugitive Slave Acts were laws passed by Congress in 1793 and 1850 (and repealed in 1864) that allowed for the capture and return of runaway slaves who escaped from one state to another or into federal territory.
Explanation:
The correct answer should be <span>cognitive-behavioral therapy. This is a therapy created specifically for treating depression but is now applied to many other disorders. It is based on changing the individual feeling and beliefs of the person who you are treating. It's goal is solving problems and resolving harmful behavioral patterns.</span>
Historians look for clues as to what life would have been like and what happened in the past, in different societies. They sift through a lot of evidence and of different geological regions.
Answer:
is this do social sciences or Spanish
