History has shown us that Sun Yat-Sen and Yuan Shigai <u>did </u><u>not share </u><u>the same </u><u>motives </u><u>for </u><u>supporting </u><u>the provisional </u><u>government</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Sun Yat-Sen and Yuan Shigai in 1911</h3>
- Both men were very influential in calls for the end of the Qing dynasty.
- Sun Yat-Sen was a strong believer in the need for China to modernize and change its governance in other to develop.
While Sun Yat-Sen had better motives for China in mind, Yuan Shigai did not and when he took over, he became increasingly authoritarian and even tried to proclaim himself emperor.
In conclusion, they did not have the same motives.
Find out more on Sun Yat-Sen at brainly.com/question/780808.
a) hunter gatherers who built mounds
The various cultures collectively termed "Mound Builders" were inhabitants of North America who, during a circa 5,000-year period, constructed various styles of earthen mounds for religious, ceremonial, burial, and elite residential purposes.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
People say that the two party system was created because the US voting system is winner take all. For example, if a presidential candidate gets the majority of votes in Florida he gets all the electoral college votes for that state it is not split between the candidates.
None of those answer choices reflect this but I feel like C is the closest.
The answers would be A and D. These are both true. It is not true however that working hours for children were restricted, nor kids had to be twelve to work. Many children worked at a very young age and didn't have an education.
The student protest at Tiananmen Square of 1989 failed because the government was in chaos.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
The death of Hu Yaobang enraged a lot of people, especially the students, leading to a lot of protests. During the initial stages of the protest, the government of China was reluctant to take any action against the rising protests, because the government was in chaos.
Some officials of the government wanted to respond with violence, whereas some voted to respond in a non violent manner. It lead to a lot of confusions, but finally the Hardliners won the debate and responded by imposing martial law on the protesting people in Beijing.
