Answer:
im pretty sure its -1 because thats the answer i had before my answers didnt save n the same test you had. im not 100 percent sure though
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
7.5/100= .075
$580000 x .075 = $43,500 commission
Hello there!
The answer to this question will be answer choice A.
When using the SAS postulate, we need two pairs of sides and the pair of the angles between those two sides to be congruent.
It is given that one pair of sides are congruent, along with a pair of congruent angles.
We want the congruent angle to be between two congruent sides, thus AC must be congruent to EC in order for these triangles to be proven congruent by the SAS postulate.
Hope this helps and have an awesome day! :)
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
It is given that Noah thinks :
9x - 2x + 4x = 3x as the subtraction sign after 9x tells us to subtract everything that comes after 9x.
This is wrong as according to the BODMAS rule, we have to do the addition operation first and then followed by subtraction operation.
That is
⇒ 9x - 2x + 4x
⇒ (9x -2x)+ 4x
⇒ 7x + 4x
⇒ 11x
Therefore the answer to the equation is 11x and not 3x.
Answer: c. 29.65 + 0.90r ≤ 41
