Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
The correct answer is Russian Revolution
The Russian Revolution of 1917 was one of the main events of the 20th century. This event broke out during the First World War (1914-1918), despite its antecedents going back to 1905, when the first revolutionary attempt took place, which had as its trigger the remarkable episode known as Bloody Sunday.
The main aspect of the Russian Revolution is that it was guided by communist doctrine, developed by the German philosopher Karl Marx in the 19th century - with the proviso that such doctrine was complemented and added to a strategic plan by the one who became the most important leader of the revolution: Lenin.
Neil howe,william strauss' ,Gary webb
sorry only know those hope it helpss
The best historical skill is "though the eyes" of Roman Empire. In other words how did the Roman people react to brutal violence of hurting one another in battles of parties-of 2 sides.
Using this historical skill the historian would interpret the reasons as to why the Roman Empire could allow battle fights. In the eyes of Roman Empire:fighting for power, win, justice, challenge for the Empire -and prosperity.
Hi heheehhehehehehehe hehehehhehehe heheheheh
